[2007] KEHC 2249 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 2249 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's costs had been taxed and a certificate of taxation issued by the Deputy Registrar. The respondent had not filed any reference or appeal against the taxation, nor disputed the retainer. The application was unopposed, and the requirements of Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act were...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KEHC 2249 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: B. Mbai & Associates Advocates; Respondent: Mbo I Kamiti Farmers Co. Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 114 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Outcome
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs as per certificate of taxation
Judges
JL Osiemo
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Costs, Certificate of Taxation
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Advocate Client Costs Certificate of Taxation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

B. Mbai & Associates Advocates

Applicant

Mbo I Kamiti Farmers Co. Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs

  1. 1 Whether the court should enter judgment for the applicant for taxed costs where the respondent has not challenged the taxation or disputed the retainer.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment in terms of the certificate of taxation issued by the Deputy Registrar.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's costs had been taxed and a certificate of taxation issued by the Deputy Registrar. The respondent had not filed any reference or appeal against the taxation, nor disputed the retainer. The application was unopposed, and the requirements of Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act were satisfied. Accordingly, the court allowed the application and entered judgment for the applicant in terms of the taxed costs as per the certificate of taxation.

Court Disposition

application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs as per certificate of taxation

Orders

  • Judgment is entered for the applicant for the sum of KES 147,195 as taxed by the Deputy Registrar on 13th May 2006.
  • The costs of this application are awarded to the applicant.