[2022] KEHC 2123 (KLR)
The court found, based on uncontroverted medical evidence, that the Respondent, SA, suffers from a mental disorder (Affective Disorder) and is incapable of managing her affairs. The Petitioner, BA, as her son and a suitable person, was therefore appointed as her Legal Guardian. However, the court limited the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 2123 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: BA; Respondent: SA
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Constitutional Petition E018 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition allowed in part; Petitioner appointed as Legal Guardian and Manager of the estate, subject to statutory limitations.
- Legal Topics
- Mental Capacity, Guardianship, Estate Management, Mental Health Act Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BA
Applicant
SA
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent, SA, is suffering from a mental disorder as defined under the Mental Health Act.
- 2 Whether the Petitioner, BA, should be appointed as the Legal Guardian and Manager of the estate of the Respondent.
- 3 What is the extent of authority that may be granted to the appointed manager under the Mental Health Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found, based on uncontroverted medical evidence, that the Respondent, SA, suffers from a mental disorder (Affective Disorder) and is incapable of managing her affairs. The Petitioner, BA, as her son and a suitable person, was therefore appointed as her Legal Guardian. However, the court limited the authority of the manager in accordance with the Mental Health Act, specifically requiring that any sale or transfer of immoveable property must be specifically authorized by the court. The court emphasized that the statutory framework is designed to protect the interests of persons suffering from mental disorder by ensuring judicial oversight over significant transactions involving...
Court Disposition
Petition allowed in part; Petitioner appointed as Legal Guardian and Manager of the estate, subject to statutory limitations.
Orders
- BA is appointed as the Legal Guardian of SA.
- BA is appointed as the Manager of the estate of SA, subject to the proviso to Section 27(1) of the Mental Health Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
49 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU
CONST. PETITION NO. E018 OF 2021
IN THE MATTER OF: THE MENTAL HEALTH ACT CAP 248
AND
IN THE MATTER OF: SA
BETWEEN
BA...........................................................................PETITIONER/APPLICANT
AND
SA.................................................................................................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
The Petition before me is premised upon the provisions of Section 26of the Mental Health Act, Cap 248of the Laws of Kenya.
1. The Petitioner, BA, is a son of theRespondent, SA.
2. It was the Petitioner’s case that the Respondent was suffering from mental disorder, and was therefore incapable of caring for herself or of making accurate decisions which appertain to her care and wellbeing.
3. According to the Petitioner, DR. PHILIP KILIMOhaddiagnosed the Respondent as a person who was suffering from AFFECTIVE DISORDER. In the circumstances, the Petitioner asked the Court to adjudge the Respondent to be a person suffering from a mental disorder.
4. Secondly, the Petitioner asked the Court to appoint him as the Respondent’s Legal Guardian.
5. Thirdly, the Petitioner asked the Court to appoint him,either by himself or by an appointed Agent, as the Manager of the estate of SA.
6. The Applicant wishes to be appointed as the Manager of all the moveable or immovable property; money; debts;legacies; power to execute or sign all deeds and instruments relating to or evidencing the title or right of any property.
7. He also seeks authority to be able to give a right to receive any money or goods; proceed to take over or initiate any litigation or claims.
8. The Applicant informed the Court that the Respondent had depleted her liquid resources. Therefore, in order to be able to raise funds for use in maintaining the Respondent, there was a need to sell one of the Respondent’s properties.
9. I have given due consideration to the application. I note that the Respondent has been diagnosed with “Affective Disorder.”The medical records show that she was agitated, and had poor concentration, coupled with loss of memory.
10. Dr. Philip Kilimo, the Medical Superitendent at the Kisumu County Referral Hospital wrote a medical report for theRespondent on 27th October 2021. He said that the Respondent had been attending the Psychiatric Outpatient Clinic from December 2014.
11. The report indicated that the Patient’s condition included;
“…….. sleep, mood disturbance andoccasionally aggressive behavior and poor concentration and loss of memory.”
12. The doctor also said that the Respondent had since developed wasting and idiopathic weakness.
13. The report stated that the Respondent’s condition was complicated to mental retardation resulting to “severed judgement.”
14. In the result, the doctor arrived at the following conclusion;
“The above cannot be allowed totransact any business due to theabove conditions and diseasecomplications.”
15. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 26 (1)of the Mental Health Act;
“The court may make orders –
(a)for the management of the estateof any person suffering frommental disorder; and
(b)for the guardianship of any person suffering from mental disorder byany near relative or by any othersuitable person.”
16. Although the Petitioner has sought authority to do allmanner of things, including power to execute, sign all deeds and instruments relating to or evidencing the title or the Respondent’s right to any property, I hold the considered opinion that it has not been demonstrated that such vast authority is required in this instance.
17. Pursuant to the proviso to Section 27 (1)of the Mental Health Act, the manager of the estate of any personsuffering from mental disorder, may be granted general or special powers for the management of the estate, as the Court considers necessary and proper …….
“Provided that –
(i)A manager so appointed shallnot, without the specialpermission of the court –
(a)mortgage, charge or transfer by sale, gift, surrender,exchange or otherwise anyimmoveable property of whichthe estate may consist
………………………..”
18. Therefore, in accordance with that statutory provision, if the Petitioner wishes to sell any particular property, he shall have to first seek specific authorization from the Court.
19. Although the Petitioner has also cited Section 29of the Mental Health Act, the said provision would only beapplicable;
“……….. instead of appointing a manager, or, notwithstanding such appointment,” ……….
the Court is satisfied that it was expedient that the property of the Respondent should be made available for his or her maintenance.
20. In the result, I now appoint BAas theRespondent’s Legal Guardian.
21. However, the authority of the said BAshall be exercised in accordance with the proviso to Section 27 (1)of the Mental Health Act.
22. Leave is granted to the manager appointed herein to move the court, when it is deemed necessary and proper, to seek authority to undertake any particular action with regard to any specified property of the Respondent.
23. The costs of this Petition shall be borne out of the proceeds from the estate of the Respondent.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022
FRED A. OCHIENG
JUDGE