[2020] KESC 11 (KLR)
The Supreme Court unanimously held that it has jurisdiction to grant leave to extend time for filing documents under its Rules. The applicant provided sufficient grounds for the delay, which was occasioned by administrative challenges in obtaining certified court documents from the Court of Appeal. The delay was not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KESC 11 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Ferdinand Ndungu Waititu Babayao; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Court Station
- Supreme Court of Kenya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition (Application) 2 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Petition Application / Application for Leave to File Supplementary Record of Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- DK Maraga, MK Ibrahim, SC Wanjala, NS Ndungu, I Lenaola
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Supplementary Record of Appeal, Court Administration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ferdinand Ndungu Waititu Babayao
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition Application / Application for Leave to File Supplementary Record of Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Supreme Court should grant leave to file a Supplementary Record of Appeal out of time.
- 2 Whether the delay in filing the Supplementary Record of Appeal was justified by administrative reasons beyond the applicant's control.
- 3 Whether the respondent would suffer prejudice if the application is allowed.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court unanimously held that it has jurisdiction to grant leave to extend time for filing documents under its Rules. The applicant provided sufficient grounds for the delay, which was occasioned by administrative challenges in obtaining certified court documents from the Court of Appeal. The delay was not attributable to the applicant's fault. The respondent did not oppose the application or demonstrate any prejudice that would result from the grant of the orders sought. The application satisfied the established principles for extension of time as set out in prior Supreme Court decisions. Consequently, the application for leave to file the Supplementary Record of Appeal out of...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The Notice of Motion application by the Petitioner dated 7th August 2020 and filed on 11th August 2020 is allowed.
- The Supplementary Record of Appeal dated 30th July 2020 and filed on 5th August 2020 is deemed as duly and properly filed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Babayao v Republic (Petition (Application) 2 of 2020) [2020] KESC 11 (KLR) (23 September 2020) (Ruling)
Ferdinand Ndungu Waititu Babayao v Republic [2020] eKLR
Neutral citation: [2020] KESC 11 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Supreme Court of Kenya
Petition (Application) 2 of 2020
DK Maraga, CJ & P, MK Ibrahim, SC Wanjala, NS Ndungu & I Lenaola, SCJJ
September 23, 2020
Between
Ferdinand Ndungu Waititu Babayao
Petitioner
and
Republic
Respondent
(Being an application for leave to file Supplementary Record of Appeal out of time)
Ruling
1. Uponperusing the Notice of Motion application by the Petitioner/Applicant dated 7th August 2020 and filed on 11th August 2020, which application is brought pursuant to leave granted by the Deputy Registrar on 14th July 2020 as well as Rule 15 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2020; and
2. Uponperusing the supporting affidavit of Counsel for the Petitioner/ Applicant, Prof. T.O. Ojienda, SC, deponed to on 7th August 2020; and
3. Uponconsidering the written submissions by the Petitioner/Applicant dated 10th August 2020 and filed on 11th August 2020 wherein the Applicant/Petitioner contends that the delay in filing the Supplementary Record of Appeal dated 30th July 2020 and filed on 5th August 2020 was occasioned by inability to obtain the order and certified copies of typed Court proceedings from the Court of Appeal timeously despite request made on 30th December 2019 and noting;Thatthe Respondent did not file any response or submissions with regard to the application despite directions issued by the Deputy Registrar on 14th August 2020, 19th August 2020 and 26th August 2020 that submissions ought to be filed by 28th August 2020. We have however seen submissions purportedly filed by the Respondent on 16th September 2020 which are hereby rejected for being filed out of time contrary to Rule 31(4) of these Court Rules 2020; and
4. Havingconsidered the application and the submissions filed by the Petitioner/Applicant, by a unanimous decision of this Bench, we find that;(a)This Court has the jurisdiction to consider and determine an application for leave to extend time to do anything required by its Rules - see Anuar Loitiptip v. Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission SC Petition (App.) No. 18 of 2018; [2018] eKLR as well as Section 21(3) of the Supreme Court Act and Rule 53 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2012;(b)That the application by the Petitioner/Applicant dated 7th August 2020 and filed on 11th August 2020 satisfies the principles set out by this Court in Base Titanium Limited v. County Government of Mombasa & another SC Petition (App). No. 22 of 2018 and earlier in Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat v. Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission & 7 others SC (App) No. 16 of 2014; (2014) eKLR on extension of time;(c)We also find that the Petitioner/Applicant has provided sufficient grounds and reasons for the delay in filing the Supplementary Record of Appeal as the delay in obtaining the order and certified typed copies of proceedings from the Court of Appeal is an administrative issue that cannot and should not be held against the Petitioner/Applicant;(d)The Respondent has not opposed the application neither has he shown what prejudice shall be occasioned upon him if the Applicant’s application is allowed.
5. In the circumstances, we now make ORDERS as follows;(a)The Notice of Motion application by the Petitioner dated 7th August 2020 and filed on 11th August 2020 is hereby allowed;(b)The Supplementary Record of Appeal dated 30th July 2020 and filed on 5th August 2020 is deemed as duly and properly filed;(c)The parties to appear before the Deputy Registrar for further directions;(d)Each party shall bear its costs.
6. Orders accordingly.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020. .............................D.K. MARAGACHIEF JUSTICE & PRESIDENT OF THE SUPREME COURT..............................M. K. IBRAHIMJUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT..............................S. C. WANJALAJUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT.................................NJOKI NDUNGUJUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT...........................I. LENAOLAJUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURTI certify that this is a true copy of the originalRegistrar,Supreme Court of Kenya