[2021] KEBPRT 638 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that the Landlord had provided uncontroverted evidence of rent arrears amounting to Kshs 2,542,600/- as at 18th January 2021, as shown in the rent statements. The Tenant, despite being properly served through their advocates, failed to file any response or contest the application. The Tribunal,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEBPRT 638 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Back 2 Back Media Tec Institute Limited; Respondent: Bharat Anantukar Patel; Respondent: Rajesh Anantkumar Patel
- Court
- Business Premises Rent Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case 529 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Landlord's Application for Payment of Rent Arrears and Leave to Levy Distress
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Controlled Tenancy, Rent Arrears, Distress for Rent, Tribunal Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Back 2 Back Media Tec Institute Limited
Applicant
Bharat Anantukar Patel
Respondent
Rajesh Anantkumar Patel
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Landlord's Application for Payment of Rent Arrears and Leave to Levy Distress
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tenant is in arrears of rent under the controlled tenancy agreement.
- 2 Whether the Landlord is entitled to an order for payment of rent arrears and leave to levy distress for rent under Cap 301 and Cap 293.
- 3 Whether the application is unopposed and properly served.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Landlord had provided uncontroverted evidence of rent arrears amounting to Kshs 2,542,600/- as at 18th January 2021, as shown in the rent statements. The Tenant, despite being properly served through their advocates, failed to file any response or contest the application. The Tribunal, exercising its jurisdiction under Cap 301 and Cap 293, determined that the Landlord was entitled to an order for payment of the outstanding rent arrears and, in default, leave to levy distress for the said amount. The application was therefore allowed as unopposed, and the Tenant was ordered to pay the arrears within thirty days, failing which the Landlord could proceed with...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The Tenant is ordered to pay rent arrears in the sum of Kshs 2,542,600/- to the Landlord within thirty days.
- If the Tenant fails to pay as directed, the Landlord has leave to levy distress for the said amount.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
46 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
TRIBUNAL CASE NO 529 OF 2019 (NAIROBI)
BACK 2 BACK MEDIA TEC
INSTITUTE LIMITED.............................................TENANT/APPLICANT
VERSUS
BHARAT ANANTUKAR PATEL................LANDLORD/1ST RESPONDENT
RAJESH ANANTKUMAR PATEL............LANDLORD/2ND RESPONDENT
RULING
The Landlord’s application by way of notice of motion dated 8th February 2021 seeks the following orders;
1. That the Tenant/Applicant herein be ordered to pay the outstanding rent arrears as at 1st January 2021 of Kshs 7,216,600/- to the Landlord/Respondent herein failing which the same be recovered by way of distress or execution.
2. That the above suit (this suit) be heard on a priority basis.
The Landlord/Applicant in the application has listed six grounds on the face of the application. These are;
1. That this case is part heard before this court.
2. That the Tenant/Applicant herein was distressed for some arrears of rent of Kshs 1,777,000/- as at February 2019.
3. That after the said distress was levied, the Landlord/Respondent did not recover the outstanding arrears of rent.
4. That the Tenant/Applicant subsequently filed this case in court and stopped any further payment of rent which had accumulated to Kshs 7,216,600/- as at January 2021.
5. That failure by the Applicant to honour its obligation to pay the rent has occasioned the Landlord/Respondent extreme financial constraint as it is unable to finance its loans and meet other financial obligations.
6. That the Tenant/Applicant should be ordered to pay the Landlord/Respondent the said outstanding rent forthwith failure to which a distress or execution should be issued.
The supporting affidavit of the Landlord can be summarized as follows;
1. That the rent payable by the Tenant was initially Kshs 220000 + VAT with an annual increament of (10%) ten per cent.
2. That as at 10th December 2018, the Tenant had outstanding rent arrears of Kshs 1,266,000/-. The Tenant’s goods were proclaimed due to this outstanding rent on 11th December 2018.
3. That as at 16th February 2019, the outstanding rent was Kshs 1,777,000/-.
4. That the rent outstanding to date is Kshs 7,216,600/-.
5. That after several mis-steps, the Tenant’s goods were eventually proclaimed on 30th May 2019 and sold on 7th June 2019.
The Tenant/Applicant, Respondent in the present application was served and an affidavit of service was filed on 22nd January 2021. The same is sworn by one Mr Musyoka Mbava Nguno, a duly licensed process server as per paragraph 1 of the said affidavit.
I have looked at the said affidavit and I am satisfied that counsel on record for the Tenant, M/S Wangira Okoba & Co Advocates were properly served. The said firm of advocates for the Tenant have not filed any responses on behalf of their client in opposition to the Landlord’s application under consideration. As it stands, the Landlord’s application dated 8th February 2021 is unopposed.
The power/jurisdiction to permit the levy of distress for rent is donated to the Tribunal under section 12(1) (h) of Cap 301.
Under section 12(4), the Tribunal may investigate any complaint relating to a controlled tenancy and may make such orders thereon as it deems fit. That is the provision under which the Applicant’s/Landlord’s application is expressed to be brought under.
The right of distress is provided for under section 3 of Cap 293 which provides;
3(1) “subject to the provisions of this Act and any other written law, any person having any rent or rent service in arrears and due upon a grant, lease, demise or contract shall have the same remedy by distress for the recovery of that rent or seat service as is given by the Common Law of England on a similar case.”
In order to grant the orders sought by the Landlord the Landlord needs to satisfy this Tribunal that there exists arrears of rent upon the lease between the Landlord and the Tenant.
I have seen the Landlord’s exhibit BAP 3 which is a rent statement of the Tenant herein dated 6th February 2019. It shows the amount of rent due as 1,777,000/-.I have also seen the Landlord’s exhibit BAP 4, a further Tenant’s statement which shows the outstanding rent as at 18th January 2021 is in the sum of Kshs 2,542,600/-. I do find that from the statements provided, the rent outstanding as at 18th January 2021 is on the sum of Kshs 2,542,600/- a fact not controverted by the Tenant in any way.
I will therefore allow the application dated 8th February 2021 in the following terms;
1. That the Tenant/Applicant is hereby ordered to pay rent arrears in the sum of Kshs 2,542,600/- to the Landlord within the next thirty days.
2. That failure to pay by the Tenant as above directed, the Landlord has leave to levy distress for the said amount.
3. That this matter be fixed for hearing on a priority basis.
CYPRIAN MUGAMBI NGUTHARI
CHAIRMAN
BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
Court:
Dated and delivered in open court this 10th day of March 2021 by Hon P. May in the presence ofthe Landlord. The firm of Obae is on record for the Tenant. No appearance.
Kalolia: Court Assistant
HON P. MAY
VICE CHAIR
BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL