[2021] KEHC 12943 (KLR)
The court found that neither party appeared nor took steps to prosecute the suit after notice was issued by the registry. In accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution, as there was no justification for the delay or absence of action by...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 12943 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Backlite Limited; Defendant: Ogilvy Kenya Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 375 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- Suit dismissed for want of prosecution with costs to the defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Case Management, Costs Award
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Backlite Limited
Plaintiff
Ogilvy Kenya Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that neither party appeared nor took steps to prosecute the suit after notice was issued by the registry. In accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution, as there was no justification for the delay or absence of action by the parties. The court further ordered that the defendant is entitled to costs as a consequence of the dismissal.
Court Disposition
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution with costs to the defendant.
Orders
- The suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
- The plaintiff shall pay the costs of the suit to the defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
14 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
COMMERCIAL AND TAX DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 375 OF 2017
BACKLITE LIMITED...........................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
OGILVY KENYA LIMITED...............................DEFENDANT
RULING
The file is before the court upon service of a Notice by the Registry for dismissal of the suit for want of prosecution.
In the absence of any party, the suit herein is dismissed for want of prosecution with costs. File shall close
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 13TH MAY, 2021
G. W. NGENYE-MACHARIA
JUDGE