[2009] KEHC 689 (KLR)
The court held that the applicant's chamber summons was incompetent because it was not accompanied by a substantive petition as required by the relevant constitutional rules. The chamber summons procedure is only available for seeking conservatory orders pending the hearing of a properly filed petition. Since no...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 689 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Badrudin Hussein Haji Issa; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Petition 33 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Petition / Ruling on Application for Conservatory Orders
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- SP Ouko
- Legal Topics
- Conservatory Orders, Fundamental Rights Protection, Procedural Irregularity
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Badrudin Hussein Haji Issa
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Petition / Ruling on Application for Conservatory Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to conservatory orders restraining the police from arresting or detaining him pending determination of the application.
- 2 Whether the application was properly brought before the court in accordance with the relevant constitutional rules.
- 3 Whether the absence of a substantive petition renders the chamber summons incompetent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the applicant's chamber summons was incompetent because it was not accompanied by a substantive petition as required by the relevant constitutional rules. The chamber summons procedure is only available for seeking conservatory orders pending the hearing of a properly filed petition. Since no petition was filed, the application was procedurally defective. The court further noted that while individual rights are protected, the police have a duty to maintain law and order, and the court must balance these interests. The failure to follow the prescribed procedure for constitutional applications was fatal to the applicant's case, leading to the dismissal of the application...
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- Conservatory or interim orders issued on 30th April, 2009 are vacated.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU Miscellaneous Petition 33 of 2009
BADRUDIN HUSSEIN HAJI ISSA………………………...……APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC ……………………………………………………..RESPONDENT
RULING
The petitioner herein was, on 30th April, 2009 granted conservatory or interim orders, whose effect was to stop the police from arresting or detaining the petitioner in their custody or cells
“pending the hearing and determination of the Chamber Summons Application dated 30th April, 2009 interpartes……….”
I will turn to this prayer shortly. The brief background to this dispute can be related as follows:
The petitioner has been issued with a temporary grant of letter of administration for the estate of his father. Prior to that appointment, the estate was being administered by other members of the family, namely the petitioner’s mother, sister and brother before it was revoked. Since
H.C.C.MISC.APPL. NO.33/2009
then, the family of the deceased has remained divided, with the petitioner on the one hand and the rest of the family united on the other hand. The rest of the family and a tenant have complained to the police about their harassment by the petitioner; that the petitioner has been breaking into certain premises comprised in the deceased person’s estate, reports of which have been made to the police.
The petitioner is now alleging that the OCS Narok Police Station is using these reports to intimidate him. As a result the petitioner has gone into hiding fearing arrest and detention. He has abandoned his family and business. These are, in summary what I am able to glean from the pleadings herein.
The first observation I wish to make is that this matter has by and large arisen from the administration of the estate of the deceased. The temporary grant to the petitioner was issued on 27th October, 2008 and is therefore due for confirmation. With the confirmation and the subsequent distribution of the estate, the family animosity will have been resolved. The family members ought to take this route to avoid wastage and acrimony.
Secondly, it must be noted that while the individual’s rights under the Constitution is guaranteed and this court enjoined to protect those rights,
H.C.C.MISC.APPL. NO.33/2009
the police have a duty to maintain law and order which in turn has a direct
correlation to those fundamental rights and freedom of the individual. The court in considering application of this kind must balance both interests.
The third point is to do with the procedure adopted in bringing this application. It is properly expressed to be brought under Rules 11 to 14 (inclusive) and 20 to 21 (inclusive) of the Constitution of Kenya (Supervisory Jurisdiction and Protection of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms of the Individual) High Court Practice and Procedure Rules, 2006. Under the latter provisions, the petitioner has been enjoying conservatory orders since April, 2009, whose effect, as I have stated, is that he had immunity against arrests – indeed of any nature.
But the petitioner, under the former provisions was expected to have brought a petition in form D of the schedule to the rules. What he has brought is chamber summons. Chamber summons can only be brought for conservatory orders pending the hearing of the Petition. There is no petition and the chamber summons is hanging.
Given the seriousness of human rights issues, it is of utmost importance that applications relating to protection of those rights are scrupulously drafted.
H.C.C.MISC.APPL. NO.33/2009
For these reasons, the application fails and is dismissed. Conservatory or interim orders issued on 30th April, 2009 are vacated.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAKURU this 30th day of October, 2009.
W. OUKO
JUDGE