[2003] KECA 149 (KLR)

[2003] KECA 149 (KLR)

The Court found that the notice of appeal was served out of time without leave and that the order appealed from did not tally with the ruling of the superior court. Since the order is a primary document and cannot be amended, these defects rendered the appeal incurably defective. The Court concluded that the appeal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2003] KECA 149 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Bahati Women Company Limited; Respondent: Joseph Mathenge Muturi; Respondent: David Muchai Ng'ang'a; Respondent: Lucy Wanjiru Muratha; Respondent: Peter O. Obwang; Respondent: Lucy Wambui Gachau; Respondent: Emily Nyambura Wachania; Respondent: Veronica Njeri; Respondent: Jacinta Njeri Mwangi
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 53 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Appeal
Outcome
Appeal struck out as incompetent.
Legal Topics
Notice of Appeal, Service Out of Time, Primary Documents, Appeal Incompetence
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Notice of Appeal Service Out of Time Primary Documents Appeal Incompetence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bahati Women Company Limited

Appellant

Joseph Mathenge Muturi

Respondent

David Muchai Ng'ang'a

Respondent

Lucy Wanjiru Muratha

Respondent

Peter O. Obwang

Respondent

Lucy Wambui Gachau

Respondent

Emily Nyambura Wachania

Respondent

Veronica Njeri

Respondent

Jacinta Njeri Mwangi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the notice of appeal was served out of time without leave.
  2. 2 Whether the order appealed from tallied with the ruling of the superior court.
  3. 3 Whether the appeal was incurably defective due to procedural irregularities.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the notice of appeal was served out of time without leave and that the order appealed from did not tally with the ruling of the superior court. Since the order is a primary document and cannot be amended, these defects rendered the appeal incurably defective. The Court concluded that the appeal was incompetent and should be struck out, with costs awarded to the respondents.

Court Disposition

Appeal struck out as incompetent.

Orders

  • The respondents' application dated 24th April, 2001 is allowed with costs.
  • The notice of appeal and the appeal are struck out as incompetent.