[2010] KEHC 135 (KLR)

[2010] KEHC 135 (KLR)

The court found that the present application to amend the statement of defence to include a counter-claim against the plaintiff is not res judicata. The previous application, which was dismissed, concerned a counter-claim against a third party (Bank of Africa Limited) and not the plaintiff. The court distinguished...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] KEHC 135 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Bajaber Limited; Defendant: Kenya Revenue Authority
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 315 of 2000
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection (res Judicata) to Amendment Application
Outcome
Objection on grounds of res judicata dismissed; application to amend defence to include counter-claim against plaintiff to proceed to hearing.
Judges
JV Juma
Legal Topics
Res Judicata, Amendment of Pleadings, Counter Claims
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Res Judicata Amendment of Pleadings Counter Claims

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bajaber Limited

Plaintiff

Kenya Revenue Authority

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection (res Judicata) to Amendment Application

  1. 1 Whether the defendant's application to amend its statement of defence to include a counter-claim against the plaintiff is barred by the doctrine of res judicata.
  2. 2 Whether the present application is directly and substantially similar to the previously dismissed application involving a counter-claim against a third party.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the present application to amend the statement of defence to include a counter-claim against the plaintiff is not res judicata. The previous application, which was dismissed, concerned a counter-claim against a third party (Bank of Africa Limited) and not the plaintiff. The court distinguished the two applications, noting that the earlier ruling addressed whether the defendant could enjoin a third party in its counter-claim, while the current application seeks a counter-claim solely against the plaintiff. As such, the issues are not directly and substantially the same, and the doctrine of res judicata does not bar the present application. The application is therefore...

Court Disposition

Objection on grounds of res judicata dismissed; application to amend defence to include counter-claim against plaintiff to proceed to hearing.

Orders

  • The application dated 13th October 2010 is not res judicata.
  • The application is to be listed for hearing.