[2017] KEELC 1493 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant lacked proprietary interest and locus standi in the suit property, as the land was registered in the name of the 2nd respondent/defendant. The applicant was not entitled to bring the application for an injunction, having no legal or equitable interest in the property. Consequently,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 1493 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Bakari Makokha; Respondent: Sylvester Odhiambo Wabuyabo; Respondent: Ali Abdalla Ali
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 220 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Judges
- NA Matheka
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Injunctions, Locus Standi, Proprietary Interest, Status Quo Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bakari Makokha
Applicant
Sylvester Odhiambo Wabuyabo
Respondent
Ali Abdalla Ali
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has established a prima facie case with a probability of success for grant of an interlocutory injunction.
- 2 Whether the applicant has locus standi and proprietary interest in the suit property to sustain the application.
- 3 Whether the balance of convenience and risk of irreparable harm justify the grant of an injunction.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant lacked proprietary interest and locus standi in the suit property, as the land was registered in the name of the 2nd respondent/defendant. The applicant was not entitled to bring the application for an injunction, having no legal or equitable interest in the property. Consequently, the application did not meet the threshold for grant of an interlocutory injunction as set out in Giella v Cassman Brown & Co. Ltd. The court therefore dismissed the application with costs to the respondent.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND AT KAKAMEGA
ELC NO. 220 OF 2017
BAKARI MAKOKHA::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT
VERSUS
SYLVESTER ODHIAMBO WABUYABO
ALI ABDALLA ALI:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT
RULING
This application is dated 28th August 2017 and is brought by way of notice of motion and seeks the following orders;
1. THAT this matter be certified as urgent and heard on priority basis.
2. THAT the honourable court be pleased to issue an order of status quo restraining the 1st defendant from utilizing land measuring 1. 01 Ha being the 2nd defendant share in respect to L.P. No. N/W/Mayoni/1108 until the hearing and determination of this application suit inter-parties and/or until further orders of this court.
3. THAT costs of this application be provided for by the 1st respondent.
The plaintiff/applicant submitted that, the 2nd defendant/respondent bought land from the applicant’s deceased father Issa Matere Munyanya in the year 2010 and he was issued with title deed in 14th March 2011 for Land Parcel No. N/W/Mayoni/1108. The 1st respondent/defendant without the applicant’s consent as the estate administrator and that of the 2nd respondent/defendant has trespassed into Land Parcel N/Wanga/Mayonyi/1108. The 1st respondent/defendant having been served with court documents has gone ahead ploughed the same ready to plant and if the orders sought are not granted the applicant and 2nd respondent/ defendant stands to continue suffering.
The 1st respondent/defendant submitted that, he is the sixth (6th) son of the late Mr. Nicholas Wabuyabo Wambusi who passed on intestate in 1982 and solemnly vested under trust from the surviving family members of the deceased father to manage, stay and cultivate land parcel No. N/Wanga/Mayoni/845 measuring approximately 3. 62 Ha and not land parcel No. N/Wanga/Mayoni/1108 as prayed by the applicant (annexed and marked Ab 1 and Ab 2). The 2nd respondent/defendant bought the said parcel N/Wanga/Mayoni/1108 from Mr. Joseph Omondi Oduor of P.O. Box 14, Musanda and not from the applicant deceased father Issa Matende Munyanya (annextures Ab3 and Ab4). That this application should be dismissed with costs.
This court has considered both the Applicant’s and the 1st respondent’s submissions and the supporting affidavits therein. The application being one that seeks injunctions, has to be considered within the principles set out in the case of GIELLA VS CASSMAN BROWN & CO. LTD 1973 E.A 358 and which are:-
1. The applicant must show a prima facie case with a probability of success at the trial
2. The applicant must show that unless the order is granted, he will suffer loss which cannot be adequately compensated in damages and,
3. If in doubt, the Court will decide the application on a balance of convenience.
It must also be added that an interlocutory injunction is an equitable relief and the Court may decline to grant it if it can be shown that the applicant’s conduct pertinent to the subject matter of the suit does not meet the approval of a Court of equity.
The plaintiff/applicant submitted that, the 2nd respondent/defendant bought land from the applicant’s deceased father Issa Matere Munyanya in the year 2010 and he was issued with title deed in 14th March 2011 for Land Parcel No. N/W/Mayoni/1108. The 1st respondent/defendant without the applicant’s consent as the estate administrator and that of the 2nd respondent/defendant has trespassed into Land Parcel N/Wanga/Mayonyi/1108. I have perused the documents on record and find that the land Parcel N/Wanga/Mayonyi/1108 is registered in the name of the 2nd respondent/defendant. The applicant in this matter has no proprietary interest and locus standi to bring this application. I find this application has no merit and dismiss it with costs.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KAKAMEGA IN OPEN COURT THIS 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017.
N. A. MATHEKA
JUDGE