[2005] KEHC 2819 (KLR)

[2005] KEHC 2819 (KLR)

The court found that there was no error apparent on the face of the record as alleged by the applicant. The learned judge had already determined that the plaintiff’s services were terminable upon reasonable notice, which was set at six months. The applicant’s dissatisfaction with this finding did not constitute...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2005] KEHC 2819 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Ballantine Awilli; Defendant: Kenya Bus Services Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 2160 of 1985
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Application to Set Aside Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Termination of Employment, Reasonable Notice, Setting Aside Judgment
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Termination of Employment Reasonable Notice Setting Aside Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ballantine Awilli

Plaintiff

Kenya Bus Services Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Application to Set Aside Judgment

  1. 1 Whether there was an error on the face of the record justifying the setting aside of the judgment.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff's services were terminated and if reasonable notice was given.
  3. 3 Whether the application to set aside judgment was brought within a reasonable time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no error apparent on the face of the record as alleged by the applicant. The learned judge had already determined that the plaintiff’s services were terminable upon reasonable notice, which was set at six months. The applicant’s dissatisfaction with this finding did not constitute grounds for setting aside the judgment; the proper remedy was to appeal. Furthermore, the application to set aside the judgment was brought approximately 12 years after the judgment was delivered, which was deemed to be an unreasonably long delay. Consequently, the application was dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application to set aside the judgment is dismissed.
  • Costs awarded to the respondent.