[1995] KECA 63 (KLR)

[1995] KECA 63 (KLR)

The Court held that, although the respondent had known about the illegible pages since April 1994, an adjournment should be granted to allow the record to be regularized in the interest of justice. However, the respondent was condemned to pay the costs of the adjournment, assessed at Kshs. 5,000, due to prior...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1995] KECA 63 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Bamburi Portland Cement Co. Ltd; Respondent: Imranali Chandbhai Abdulhussein
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 83 of 1995
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Ruling on Adjournment and Record Competence
Outcome
Adjournment granted with costs to appellant; notice of motion to strike out appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
JM Gachuhi
Legal Topics
Appeal Record Completeness, Adjournment, Costs Award
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeal Record Completeness Adjournment Costs Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bamburi Portland Cement Co. Ltd

Appellant

Imranali Chandbhai Abdulhussein

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Ruling on Adjournment and Record Competence

  1. 1 Whether the presence of illegible pages in the record of appeal renders the appeal incompetent.
  2. 2 Whether an adjournment should be granted to allow the respondent to file a supplementary record.
  3. 3 Who should bear the costs of the adjournment.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that, although the respondent had known about the illegible pages since April 1994, an adjournment should be granted to allow the record to be regularized in the interest of justice. However, the respondent was condemned to pay the costs of the adjournment, assessed at Kshs. 5,000, due to prior knowledge of the defect and delay in raising the issue. The Court also dismissed the respondent's notice of motion to strike out the appeal, which had been purportedly withdrawn, with costs. The supplementary record, if any, was to be filed within 45 days, and the costs paid within 14 days, failing which execution would issue. The appeal was to be listed for hearing in the next...

Court Disposition

Adjournment granted with costs to appellant; notice of motion to strike out appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Adjournment granted to allow filing of supplementary record within 45 days.
  • Notice of motion to strike out appeal dismissed with costs.