[2019] KEHC 2125 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 2125 (KLR)

The court found that Meru CMCC No. 102 of 2018 had already been struck out and was therefore spent, making any application for stay or transfer of that suit moot. Regarding ELC No. 53 of 2015, the court held that any application for transfer should be made before the trial judge. The court determined that Meru CMCC...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 2125 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Bank of Africa Limited; Respondent: Erick Mugambi Kinyua; Respondent: Justus Kinyua Nkanata; Respondent: Lucy Kagenio Murungi; Respondent: Gem CM Construction Limited through the Office of the Official Receiver; Respondent: Martin Kinoti; Respondent: View Line Auctioneers
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 68 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Transfer and Consolidation of Suits
Outcome
Application partially allowed.
Legal Topics
Transfer of Suits, Consolidation of Proceedings, Abuse of Process, Statutory Power of Sale, Loan Recovery
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Banking and Finance Transfer of Suits Consolidation of Proceedings Abuse of Process Statutory Power of Sale Loan Recovery

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bank of Africa Limited

Applicant

Erick Mugambi Kinyua

Respondent

Justus Kinyua Nkanata

Respondent

Lucy Kagenio Murungi

Respondent

Gem CM Construction Limited through the Office of the Official Receiver

Respondent

Martin Kinoti

Respondent

View Line Auctioneers

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Transfer and Consolidation of Suits

  1. 1 Whether the multiple suits filed by the respondents constitute an abuse of court process and should be consolidated or transferred.
  2. 2 Whether the proceedings in Meru CMCC No. 75 of 2019 and Nairobi CMCC No. 5156 of 2019 should be stayed or transferred to the High Court for hearing and determination.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Meru CMCC No. 102 of 2018 had already been struck out and was therefore spent, making any application for stay or transfer of that suit moot. Regarding ELC No. 53 of 2015, the court held that any application for transfer should be made before the trial judge. The court determined that Meru CMCC No. 75 of 2019 and Nairobi CMCC No. 5156 of 2019 involved similar subject matter—specifically, the same parcels of land and the same underlying loan transaction. Given that the 5th respondent acknowledged the convenience of litigating in Nairobi, and to avoid multiplicity of suits and inconsistent decisions, the court ordered the transfer of Meru CMCC No. 75 of 2019 to Nairobi...

Court Disposition

Application partially allowed.

Orders

  • Meru CMCC No. 75 of 2019 is transferred to Nairobi Milimani Commercial Chief Magistrates Court for consolidation with Nairobi CMCC No. 5156 of 2019 for hearing and determination.
  • Costs of the application to be paid by the 1st and 5th respondents to the applicant.