[2000] KEHC 481 (KLR)

[2000] KEHC 481 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had satisfactorily explained and justified the basis for charging interest on overdue interest and default interest, and that the defendants had failed to adduce any evidence in rebuttal. Consequently, the court held that the plaintiff was entitled to judgment on those heads of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2000] KEHC 481 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Bank Of Baroda; Defendant: Kenya Re-Claimed Rubber (1985) & 4 others
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 1318 of 1997
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Interest After Consent Judgment
Outcome
Judgment entered in favour of the plaintiff for overdue interest, default interest, and interest on the decretal sum at court rates.
Legal Topics
Interest on Debt, Default Interest, Consent Judgment, Decretal Sum Interest
Source Language
en
Banking and Finance Civil Procedure Interest on Debt Default Interest Consent Judgment Decretal Sum Interest

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bank Of Baroda

Plaintiff

Kenya Re-Claimed Rubber (1985) & 4 others

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Interest After Consent Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to charge interest on overdue interest and default interest as claimed in the plaint.
  2. 2 Whether interest on the decretal sum should be awarded at court rates.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had satisfactorily explained and justified the basis for charging interest on overdue interest and default interest, and that the defendants had failed to adduce any evidence in rebuttal. Consequently, the court held that the plaintiff was entitled to judgment on those heads of interest as prayed in the plaint, together with interest on the decretal sum at court rates. The decision was grounded on the unchallenged evidence presented by the plaintiff and the contractual terms underlying the claim.

Court Disposition

Judgment entered in favour of the plaintiff for overdue interest, default interest, and interest on the decretal sum at court rates.

Orders

  • Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants in respect of overdue interest and default interest as prayed in the plaint.
  • Interest on the decretal sum awarded at court rates.