[1997] KECA 309 (KLR)

[1997] KECA 309 (KLR)

The Court held that since the original Civil Appeal No. 192/95 was struck out on 10th November, 1995, it could not be revived, and the respondents failed to file a fresh appeal within the time prescribed by the Rules of the Court. The respondents did not contest the applicant's argument. Therefore, the notice of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1997] KECA 309 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Bank of Credit & Commerce International (Overseas) Ltd; Respondent: United Coreboard Products Ltd; Respondent: Kunvarji Shivji Varshani; Respondent: Shamji Shivji Varshani; Respondent: Naran Shivji Varshani
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 378 of 1996
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed. Notice of appeal dated 31st May, 1996 struck out with costs to the applicant.
Judges
RO Kwach, AB Shah
Legal Topics
Appeals Process, Notice of Appeal, Striking Out Proceedings
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeals Process Notice of Appeal Striking Out Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bank of Credit & Commerce International (Overseas) Ltd

Applicant

United Coreboard Products Ltd

Respondent

Kunvarji Shivji Varshani

Respondent

Shamji Shivji Varshani

Respondent

Naran Shivji Varshani

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the notice of appeal dated 31st May, 1996 should be struck out for failure to file a fresh appeal within the prescribed time after the original appeal was struck out.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that since the original Civil Appeal No. 192/95 was struck out on 10th November, 1995, it could not be revived, and the respondents failed to file a fresh appeal within the time prescribed by the Rules of the Court. The respondents did not contest the applicant's argument. Therefore, the notice of appeal dated 31st May, 1996 was invalid and was struck out with costs to the applicant.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Notice of appeal dated 31st May, 1996 struck out with costs to the applicant.

Orders

  • The notice of appeal filed on 31st May, 1996 is struck out.
  • Costs awarded to the applicant.