[2017] KEELRC 796 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent/applicant failed to file an appeal within the sixty-day period required by the Court of Appeal Rules after lodging a notice of appeal. There was no evidence that the applicant had sought or obtained an extension of time to file the appeal. The court held that, in the absence of a...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELRC 796 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Banking Insurance and Finance Union (Kenya); Respondent: Barclays Bank of Kenya Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 1251 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Judges
- NJ Abuodha
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Appeal Timelines, Execution of Judgment, Abuse of Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Banking Insurance and Finance Union (Kenya)
Applicant
Barclays Bank of Kenya Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent/applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment and decree pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the application for stay is merited given the delay and absence of a filed appeal within the prescribed period.
- 3 Whether the failure to seek extension of time to file an appeal affects the application for stay.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent/applicant failed to file an appeal within the sixty-day period required by the Court of Appeal Rules after lodging a notice of appeal. There was no evidence that the applicant had sought or obtained an extension of time to file the appeal. The court held that, in the absence of a properly instituted appeal or a valid explanation for the delay, there was no legal basis to grant a stay of execution. The court further noted that the application was filed after inordinate delay and amounted to an abuse of the court process. Consequently, the application for stay of execution was dismissed with costs to the claimant.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application for stay of execution is dismissed with costs to the claimant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
44 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 1251 OF 2014
BANKING INSURANCE AND
FINANCE UNION (KENYA)..........................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
BARCLAYS BANK OF KENYA LIMITED............RESPONDENT
M/S Oyombe for respondent/applicant
Mr. Tom Odero for claimant/respondent
RULING
1. In its notice of motion application filed on 24th November 2016, the respondent/applicant seeks an order for stay of execution of the Judgment and decree delivered on 13th April 2016.
2. The application is based on the grounds set out on the face of the application that may be summarized as follows;
That the applicant has lodged a notice of appeal against the whole of the said decision as per Rule 75 of the court of Appeal Rules and has requested for typed copies of the proceedings in the trial court for purpose of appeal.
That claimant has commenced execution proceedings by instructing auctioneers to proclaim, attach and sell respondent’s movable property worth Kshs. 3,015,725.
That the applicant has an arguable appeal with high chances of success and draft memorandum of appeal is attached.
That applicant will be unable to refund the decretal sum if paid and thus render the appeal nugatory.
3. The application is opposed vide a replying affidavit of the 1st National Deputy General Secretary of the claimant union.
4. That the notice of appeal was filed on 18th April 2016 and since then no appeal has been filed todate.
5. That on 31st October 2016 240 days after Judgment was delivered, the claimant commenced execution proceedings hence this application which was filed on 24th November 2016.
6. That the draft memorandum of appeal, presents no arguable appeal. That no memorandum of appeal was filed within the sixty (60) days contemplated by the rules of Court of Appeal and in terms of Rule 83 of the Court of Appeal Rules which reads as follows;-
“if a party who has lodged a notice of appeal fails to institute an appeal within the appointed time, he shall be deemed to have withdrawn his notice of appeal and the court may on its own motion or on the application of any party make such orders.”
7. The Decision of the Court of Appeal in the case of;
Maureen Odero Vs. Kenya Pipeline Company Limited [2015] eKLRwhere the court referred to its earlier decision in Kali Security Company Vs. Mureithi [2005] KLR 91. The court reiterated that Rule 81 (1) of the Court of Appeal Rules [now 82 (1)] requires that an appeal should be lodged within sixty (60) days of the date when a notice of appeal was ledged and the only exception to that Rule is where the period certified as having been necessary for preparation of the record is excluded from computation of time without the need to seek an order of the court. Rule 81 (2) and which is now Rule 82 (2) must however be complied with for the certificate of delay to be acceptable, is instructive on this matter.
8. There being no appeal, there cannot be any basis to grant stay of execution.
9. That there are no averments by the applicant that it has sought any extension of time within which to file an appeal.
10. That it is in the interest of justice that the claimant be allowed to enjoy the fruits of Judgment.
11. That this application has been visited by inordinate delay and is an abuse of court process.
Determination
12. Upon considering all the circumstances of the case set out herein before, there being no appeal filed within sixty (60) days of noting the notice of appeal, and there being no evidence that extension of time has been sought and granted, there is no basis to grant a stay of execution.
13. Furthermore, the application is visited by inordinate delay and is tantamount to abuse of court process.
14. The application is dismissed with costs.
Dated and Signed at Nairobi this 18th day of August, 2017.
MATHEWS NDERI NDUMA
PRINCIPAL JUDGE
Dated, Delivered and Signed at Nairobi this 18th day of August, 2017.
JORAM NELSON ABUODHA
JUDGE
Delivered in the presence of:
………………………………………….………………..
……….……………………………….………………….
………………………………………….………..………
…………………………………………….……………..
………………………………………………….………..