[2017] KEELRC 796 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 796 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent/applicant failed to file an appeal within the sixty-day period required by the Court of Appeal Rules after lodging a notice of appeal. There was no evidence that the applicant had sought or obtained an extension of time to file the appeal. The court held that, in the absence of a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 796 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Banking Insurance and Finance Union (Kenya); Respondent: Barclays Bank of Kenya Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1251 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
NJ Abuodha
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Appeal Timelines, Execution of Judgment, Abuse of Process
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Appeal Timelines Execution of Judgment Abuse of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Banking Insurance and Finance Union (Kenya)

Applicant

Barclays Bank of Kenya Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the respondent/applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment and decree pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the application for stay is merited given the delay and absence of a filed appeal within the prescribed period.
  3. 3 Whether the failure to seek extension of time to file an appeal affects the application for stay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent/applicant failed to file an appeal within the sixty-day period required by the Court of Appeal Rules after lodging a notice of appeal. There was no evidence that the applicant had sought or obtained an extension of time to file the appeal. The court held that, in the absence of a properly instituted appeal or a valid explanation for the delay, there was no legal basis to grant a stay of execution. The court further noted that the application was filed after inordinate delay and amounted to an abuse of the court process. Consequently, the application for stay of execution was dismissed with costs to the claimant.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application for stay of execution is dismissed with costs to the claimant.