[2025] KECPT 278 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that the claimant's membership and share contributions were not disputed by the respondent. The respondent acknowledged the claimant's entitlement to a refund, subject only to a deduction of a non-refundable membership fee of Kshs. 1,000. There was no evidence of outstanding loans or guarantees...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KECPT 278 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Harrison Wafula Barasa; Respondent: Bob Morgan Sacco Society Limited
- Court
- Cooperative Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case 950/E1158 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Tribunal Claim / Judgment
- Outcome
- claim allowed in part
- Judges
- BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
- Legal Topics
- Sacco Member Refund, Share Contributions, Membership Withdrawal, Contractual Entitlement
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harrison Wafula Barasa
Applicant
Bob Morgan Sacco Society Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to a refund of his share contributions upon withdrawal from the respondent Sacco.
- 2 Whether the respondent is entitled to deduct a non-refundable membership fee from the refund amount.
- 3 Whether there are any outstanding loans or guarantees that should be deducted from the claimant's refund.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the claimant's membership and share contributions were not disputed by the respondent. The respondent acknowledged the claimant's entitlement to a refund, subject only to a deduction of a non-refundable membership fee of Kshs. 1,000. There was no evidence of outstanding loans or guarantees against the claimant. The Tribunal held that the claimant had proved his case on a balance of probabilities and was entitled to a refund of Kshs. 144,800 (after deducting the non-refundable fee), together with costs and interest at Tribunal rates from the date of filing until payment in full. The respondent's financial difficulties did not absolve it from its statutory and...
Court Disposition
claim allowed in part
Orders
- Judgment entered for the claimant against the respondent for Kshs. 144,800.
- The respondent shall pay costs of the claim to the claimant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
Barasa v Bob Morgan Sacco Society Limited (Tribunal Case 950/E1158 of 2023) [2025] KECPT 278 (KLR) (29 April 2025) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2025] KECPT 278 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Cooperative Tribunal
Tribunal Case 950/E1158 of 2023
BM Kimemia, Chair, Janet Mwatsama, Vice Chair, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw & PO Aol, Members
April 29, 2025
Between
Harrison Wafula Barasa
Claimant
and
Bob Morgan Sacco Society Limited
Respondent
Judgment
1. The Statement of Claim dated 13th December, 2023 was filed by the Claimant on 22nd January, 2024.
2. Therein, the Claimant states that on or about 2019, the Claimant being Payroll No. 98386 of the Respondent formally withdrew from the society and requested refund of his shares totaling to Kshs. 145,800/=; that despite demand and notice of intention to sue having been issued the Respondent has not made good demand hereby necessitating this claim.The Claimant’s prayer against the Respondent is for Judgement for:i.Payment of his total contribution Kshs. 145,800/=.ii.Such orders and directions as it may deem fit to meet the ends of notice.iii.The Respondent to pay the costs of this claim.iv.Interest on the above at Court Rates.
3. The Statement of Claim is accompanied by the Claimant’s Statement dated 13th December, 2023 filed on 22nd January, 2024 and the List of Documents dated 13th December, 2023 and filed on 22nd January, 2024.
4. In response to the Statement of Claim, the Respondent filed a Statement of Defence dated 30th January, 2024.
5. Therein, the Respondent denies the contents of Paragraph 3 of the Statement of Claim and states on a without prejudice basis, that if the Claimant is entitled to the refund of Kshs. 145,800/=, the same is payable after clearing the outstanding loans, guarantees and less the non-refundable fee of Kshs. 1,000/=; further, the Respondent denies the contents of Paragraph 4 of the Statement of Claim that demand and notice of intention were issued to no avail.
6. The Defence is supported by the Respondents List of Witnesses dated 5th February, 2025 and The Witness Statement dated 5th February, 2025 both filed on even date.
7. Parties were directed to canvass the matter by way of Written Submissions; wit Notice to Issue to the Respondent’s advocate who had failed to attend before The Tribunal on all the dates that the matter came up.
8. On 5th February, 2025, the Claimant filed his Written Submissions dated 10th December, 2024. However, as at the date of writing this Judgement, the Respondent had not filed any submissions.
Claimant’s Submissions: 9. The Claimant submits that as per The Respondent’s By-Laws, a member ought to be refunded his shares within 60 days from the date of withdrawal; further, the Claimant has submitted extensively on the subject of Burden of Proof on a Balance of Probability and with the support of Legal Authorities argues that the Claimant has proved his case on a Balance of Probability; that the Respondent’s Statement of Defence raises no triable issues, is frivolous, baseless and has no leg to stand and ought to be struck out and Judgement be entered for the sum of Kshs. 145,800/= with interest and costs.
Determination: 10. We have considered the pleadings and all the documents filed by the parties as well as the Claimant’s Submissions and find only one issue for determination, that is whether or not the Claimant is entitled to prayers sought in the Statement of Claim dated 13th December, 2023.
11. The Claimant’s membership in the Respondent Sacco is not disputed by The Respondent. In the Witness Statement dated 5th February,2025, the Respondent’s Witness, Bernard Musembi confirms that the Claimant was the Respondent’s member; Member 502-98386.
12. Further, the Respondent’s said witness states that as per the Claimant’s member statement, the Claimant had Kshs. 144,800/= shares as at 31st December, 2019.
13. The Claimant’s payment supported by his Pay slip that he had contributed Kshs. 145,800/= which he sought to be refunded is not credible; considering that in the Statement of Defence, the Respondent sates, albeit on or without prejudice basis, that the sum of Kshs. 145,800/=, if refundable, would be subject to deductions including the Kshs. 1,000/= non-refundable membership fees.
14. It is clear that the Respondent does not deny the Claim and as per the Witness Statement of Bernard Musembi, the Respondent is said to have financial problems and can only pay The Claimant through installments.
15. In the upshot, we find that the Claimant’s Case has merit and having no reason to doubt that there was a registration fee of Kshs. 1,000/= and there being no evidence of existence of any outstanding loans or guarantees, we hereby allow the Claim and enter Judgement in favour of the Claimant against the Respondent on the sum of Kshs. 144,800/= plus costs of the Claim and interest at Tribunal Rates from the date of filing claim until payment in full.
SIGNED, DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI THIS 29TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025. HON. B. KIMEMIA CHAIRPERSON SIGNED 29. 4.2025HON. J. MWATSAMA DEPUTY CHAIRPERSON SIGNED 29. 4.2025HON. BEATRICE SAWE MEMBER SIGNED 29. 4.2025HON. FRIDAH LOTUIYA MEMBER SIGNED 29. 4.2025HON. PHILIP GICHUKI MEMBER SIGNED 29. 4.2025HON. MICHAEL CHESIKAW MEMBER SIGNED 29. 4.2025HON. P. AOL MEMBER SIGNED 29. 4.2025Tribunal Clerk JemimahClaimant – Ngichabe advocate for ClaimantRespondent - No appearance for RespondentHON. B. KIMEMIA CHAIRPERSON SIGNED 29. 4.2025