[2022] KEHC 15422 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 15422 (KLR)

The court found that the application for leave to amend the statement of defence and counterclaim was unopposed, as the respondent had been served and granted time to respond but failed to do so. In the absence of opposition, and in line with the principles of fair hearing and procedural justice, the court exercised...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 15422 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Barclays Bank of Kenya Limited; Defendant: Elizabeth Agidza; Defendant: Nathan Ondego Mdeizi; Defendant: Alfred Sagwa Mdeizi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Commercial Case 3 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Leave to Amend Defence and Counterclaim
Outcome
Application allowed; leave granted to file amended defence and counterclaim; directions issued for further pleadings and compliance.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Leave to Amend, Counterclaim Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Amendment of Pleadings Leave to Amend Counterclaim Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Barclays Bank of Kenya Limited

Plaintiff

Elizabeth Agidza

Defendant

Nathan Ondego Mdeizi

Defendant

Alfred Sagwa Mdeizi

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Case / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Leave to Amend Defence and Counterclaim

  1. 1 Whether the defendant should be granted leave to file an amended statement of defence and counterclaim.
  2. 2 Whether the application for leave to amend is opposed or unopposed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for leave to amend the statement of defence and counterclaim was unopposed, as the respondent had been served and granted time to respond but failed to do so. In the absence of opposition, and in line with the principles of fair hearing and procedural justice, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application. The court further issued directions for the timelines within which the amended pleadings and replies should be filed and served by both parties, ensuring orderly progression of the matter.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; leave granted to file amended defence and counterclaim; directions issued for further pleadings and compliance.

Orders

  • The defendant is granted leave to file an amended statement of defence and counterclaim and serve upon the plaintiff within 21 days.
  • The plaintiff shall have 15 days from the date of service to file and serve a reply to the amended defence and counterclaim or an amended plaint as the case may be.