[2018] KEELRC 1324 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 1324 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant breached the terms of his employment contract by absenting himself from work without authority and failing to return when required. His subsequent resignation, rather than returning to work, constituted a fundamental breach. The respondent's acceptance of the resignation did not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 1324 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Barrack Ojero Nyasio; Respondent: Taws Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 904 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed. Counterclaim allowed.
Judges
DKN Marete
Legal Topics
Unlawful Termination, Breach of Employment Contract, Severance Pay, Notice Periods, Counter Claims
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unlawful Termination Breach of Employment Contract Severance Pay Notice Periods Counter Claims

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Barrack Ojero Nyasio

Claimant

Taws Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant breached the terms of the employment contract.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent is entitled to the counter claim for salary in lieu of notice.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought for alleged unlawful termination.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant breached the terms of his employment contract by absenting himself from work without authority and failing to return when required. His subsequent resignation, rather than returning to work, constituted a fundamental breach. The respondent's acceptance of the resignation did not amount to a waiver of the right to notice or salary in lieu of notice. The claimant failed to prove unlawful termination, as the cessation of employment was caused by his own actions. Consequently, the claimant was disentitled to the reliefs sought, and the respondent was entitled to the counterclaim for two months' salary in lieu of notice as per the collective bargaining...

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed. Counterclaim allowed.

Orders

  • The claimant's claim is dismissed.
  • Each party to bear their own costs of the claim.