[2024] KEHC 221 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant was not entitled to have the pre-conviction custody period considered in his sentence computation because he was on bond prior to conviction, as previously determined by the appellate court. However, the court acknowledged the applicant's rehabilitative efforts, favourable prison...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 221 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Gunga Wakili Baya Alias Juma; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E152 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Sentence Review Application After Conviction and Appeal Dismissed
- Outcome
- Probation report ordered to assess suitability for release; sentence review deferred.
- Judges
- A. Ong’injo
- Legal Topics
- Defilement, Sentence Review, Mitigation, Pre Sentence Custody, Probation Eligibility
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gunga Wakili Baya Alias Juma
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Sentence Review Application After Conviction and Appeal Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to sentence review based on mitigation and time spent in custody.
- 2 Whether the period spent in custody before conviction should be considered in computing the sentence under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- 3 Whether the applicant is suitable for release on probation given his conduct and rehabilitation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant was not entitled to have the pre-conviction custody period considered in his sentence computation because he was on bond prior to conviction, as previously determined by the appellate court. However, the court acknowledged the applicant's rehabilitative efforts, favourable prison report, and first offender status as relevant mitigating factors. The court directed that a probation report be prepared to assess the applicant's suitability for release on probation, given that he has served 8 years and 10 months of his 15-year sentence and has one year and two months remaining. The matter was set for mention for sentence review upon receipt of the probation...
Court Disposition
Probation report ordered to assess suitability for release; sentence review deferred.
Orders
- Probation Office to avail a report on the applicant's suitability for release on probation.
- Matter mentioned on 7/2/2024 for sentence review.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Baya alias Juma v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E152 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 221 (KLR) (19 January 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 221 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Mombasa
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E152 of 2023
A. Ong’injo, J
January 19, 2024
Between
Gunga Wakili Baya Alias Juma
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The applicant Gunga Wakili Baya was charged and convicted in Mombasa Chief Magistrates Court CR. Case No. 1736 of 2011 with the offence of defilement contrary to Section 8(1) as read with Section 8(4) of the Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006.
2. Particulars are that between 23rd May 2011 and 25th May 2011 at Kisauni District of the Coast Province the Applicant unlawfully and intentionally caused his penis to penetrate the vagina of LW a girl aged 16 years.
3. The Applicant was found guilty and sentenced to 15 years imprisonment. Applicants appeal in Mombasa H. C. CR. A. No. 41 of 2015 was determined on 12th May 2020 and the same was dismissed and conviction and sentence upheld. The Applicant now seeks that his sentence be reviewed in considerations of his mitigation and that the court takes into account the period he was in custody both before and after conviction.
4. The Applicants mitigating factors are that during his incarceration he had undergone several rehabilitative programmes that are meant to restrain him from engaging in criminal activities in his life. He also submitted that the prisons authority had granted him a favourable progressive report commending his character while in prison. He also said he is 1st offender and a 34 years old young man.
5. Judgment against the Applicant was delivered on 2nd March 2015. He was arrested and charged in 2011. The appellate court considered his submissions a pre-conviction and it was established that he had been on bond prior to his conviction and he was therefore not entitled to benefit from provisions of Section 333(2) Criminal Procedure Code. It was ordered that his appeal runs from the date he was sentenced on 2nd March 2015.
6. The Applicant has therefore been in custody for 8 years and 10 months. He remains with One (1) year and Two (2) months for which the Probation Office should avail a report as to his suitability to be released on Probation. Mention – 7/2/2024 for Sentence Review.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT/ONLINE THROUGH MS TEAMS THIS 19TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024HON. LADY JUSTICE A. ONG’INJOJUDGEIn the presence of: -Etropia - Court AssistantMr. Ngiri for the RespondentApplicant- Present in personHON. LADY JUSTICE A. ONG’INJOJUDGE