[2006] KEHC 2521 (KLR)

[2006] KEHC 2521 (KLR)

The court found that the judgment was delivered on 2nd March, 2004 but was erroneously dated 3rd March, 2004, constituting an error arising from an accidental slip or omission. Section 99 of the Civil Procedure Act empowers the court to correct such errors at any time, either on its own motion or on application by a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] KEHC 2521 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Beat Koch; Defendant: Mukawa Hotels Holdings Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 888 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Correct Judgment Under Section 99 of the Civil Procedure Act
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
DW Mbuteti
Legal Topics
Correction of Judgment, Clerical Errors, Accidental Slip Rule
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Correction of Judgment Clerical Errors Accidental Slip Rule

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Beat Koch

Plaintiff

Mukawa Hotels Holdings Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Correct Judgment Under Section 99 of the Civil Procedure Act

  1. 1 Whether the court can correct the date of a judgment under section 99 of the Civil Procedure Act due to an accidental slip or omission.
  2. 2 Whether the judgment delivered on 2nd March, 2004 but dated 3rd March, 2004 constitutes a correctable error.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the judgment was delivered on 2nd March, 2004 but was erroneously dated 3rd March, 2004, constituting an error arising from an accidental slip or omission. Section 99 of the Civil Procedure Act empowers the court to correct such errors at any time, either on its own motion or on application by a party. Order 20, rule 3(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules requires that a judgment be dated and signed at the time of pronouncement. Since the error was clear from the court record and the defendant did not oppose the application, the court allowed the correction by substituting the correct date of delivery, 2nd March, 2004, in place of the erroneous date, 3rd March, 2004.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The date of the judgment is amended to read 2nd March, 2004 instead of 3rd March, 2004.
  • No order as to costs.