[2019] KEHC 4947 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff sustained serious injuries as a result of the 2nd defendant's negligent driving, with liability apportioned at 80% against the defendants and 20% contributory negligence on the plaintiff. The court accepted the medical evidence and receipts provided, awarding Ksh.800,000 for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 4947 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Beatrice Gathigia Mwangi; Defendant: Nguyai Leah; Defendant: Truphena Naxalayo
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 578 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants jointly and severally, subject to 20% contributory negligence.
- Judges
- A Mbogholi-Msagha
- Legal Topics
- Personal Injury, Road Traffic Accident, Damages Assessment, Contributory Negligence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Beatrice Gathigia Mwangi
Plaintiff
Nguyai Leah
Defendant
Truphena Naxalayo
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages for injuries sustained in the road traffic accident.
- 2 How liability should be apportioned between the parties given the agreed contributory negligence.
- 3 What is the appropriate quantum for general, special, and future medical damages.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff sustained serious injuries as a result of the 2nd defendant's negligent driving, with liability apportioned at 80% against the defendants and 20% contributory negligence on the plaintiff. The court accepted the medical evidence and receipts provided, awarding Ksh.800,000 for general damages, Ksh.2,295,697.28 for special damages, and Ksh.500,000 for future medical expenses. The total award was reduced by 20% to reflect contributory negligence, resulting in a net sum of Ksh.2,876,557.82. The court also awarded costs and interest, subject to the same reduction. The assessment was guided by comparable case law and the specific facts and injuries in this case.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants jointly and severally, subject to 20% contributory negligence.
Orders
- Plaintiff awarded Ksh.800,000 general damages for pain and suffering.
- Plaintiff awarded Ksh.2,295,697.28 special damages.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
CIVIL CASE NUMBER 578 OF 2011
BEATRICE GATHIGIA MWANGI.....................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
NGUYAI LEAH...........................................................1ST DEFENDANT
TRUPHENA NAXALAYO.........................................2ND DEFENDANT
J U D G M E N T
The plaintiff was injured as a result of a road traffic accident involving motor vehicle registration No. KAU 557H. She brought this suit against the defendants for damages for the injuries that she sustained.
The parties herein agreed and recorded judgment on liability at 80% against the 2nd defendant in favour of the plaintiff and 20% contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. The 2nd defendant was the driver of the said motor vehicle which was owned by the 1st defendant. The parties also agreed that there be an award of Ksh.500,000/- for future medical expenses. Original receipts and invoices were to be provided to the court for assessment of special damages pleaded, and the parties were to rely on medical reports that had been filed to assess general damages.
In that regard both parties have filed submissions which I have on record, alongside some authorities which I have been asked to consider in the assessment of damages.
The plaintiff has provided an original receipt issued by Karen Hospital against the payment of Ksh.2,295,197. 28 for the medical bill. The said receipt bears a serial number, a stamp of the Karen Hospital Limited and a revenue receipt. It is dated 4th June, 2010 and I have no reason to doubt the same.
The plaintiff has also provided a receipt for Ksh.500/- paid for obtaining the details of the motor vehicle that was involved in the accident. The total proved special damages therefore, amounts to Ksh.2,295,697. 28.
On general damages, I have considered the medical reports prepared by Dr. P. M. Wambugu dated 28th March, 2012 and by Dr. David G. Kinyanjui dated 18th March, 2011.
The plaintiff sustained a fracture to the right femur, extensive degloving wound on the right shin, and as a result developed deformity of the injured site leading to 40% permanent incapacity. She was in hospital for a period of about 2 months, but the fracture site did not unite completely. She experienced post-surgery complications which, other than the non-union of the right femur fracture site, there was deep venous thrombosis. She was 62 years old and a retired nurse.
There is a report by the Metropolitan Hospital dated 15th July,2017 which indicated that there is still non-union of the fracture site, and that the plaintiff may require removal of the nail which had been implanted to the fracture site plus total knee replacement.
I am guided by the medical reports and the authorities referred to by both counsel which included the following Omar Musa Hassan & Another Vs Rashid Salim & Another [2000] eKLR, Florence Njoki Mwangi Vs Peter Chege Mbitiru (2014) eKLR, Lucy Nyambura Mungai Vs Thomas Gikonyo Mundia (2011) eKLR.
Comparable injuries should attract comparable awards. No amount of compensation however, can ever repair an injury sustained by a human being. Each case has to be considered on its own merit. I have considered all the material placed before me with the view to arriving at a fair compensation for the injuries sustained by the plaintiff. I bear in mind the depreciation of the currency, and the fact that future medical intervention which has been provided for in the settlement by the parties may, to some extent, reduce the suffering of the plaintiff. Doing the best I can I make an award of ksh.800,000/- general damages for pain and suffering.
In the end there shall be judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants jointly and severally as follows: -
a) General damages Ksh. 800,000. 00
b) Special damages Ksh.2,295,697. 28
c) Future medical Expenses Ksh. 500,000. 00
TOTAL Ksh.3,595,697. 28
Less 20% (Ksh. 719,139. 46)
TOTAL Ksh.2,876,557. 82
========
The plaintiff shall also have the costs of the suit plus interest at court rates which shall also be subject to 20% contributory negligence on her part.
Dated, signed and delivered at Nairobi this 6th day of June, 2019.
A. MBOGHOLI MSAGHA
JUDGE