[2011] KEHC 2909 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had proved her case on a balance of probabilities. The evidence established that the defendant was registered as proprietor of the suit land to hold it in trust for the interested party, his mother. The defendant's refusal to transfer the land back, his actions in treating the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 2909 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Beatrice Kagai Lovoni; Interested Party: Phoebe Kivandi Lovon; Defendant: Hillary Kamadi Alugaya
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 168 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim allowed in part; suit land to be transferred to interested party; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Trusts in Land, Fraudulent Transfer, Land Registration, Title Cancellation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Beatrice Kagai Lovoni
Plaintiff
Phoebe Kivandi Lovon
Interested Party
Hillary Kamadi Alugaya
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant held the suit property in trust for the interested party.
- 2 Whether the defendant obtained title to the suit land fraudulently.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to cancellation of the defendant's title and transfer to the interested party.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had proved her case on a balance of probabilities. The evidence established that the defendant was registered as proprietor of the suit land to hold it in trust for the interested party, his mother. The defendant's refusal to transfer the land back, his actions in treating the property as his own, and his failure to account for rent or abide by the terms of the trust amounted to a breach of trust and fraudulent conduct. As the defendant did not contest the suit, the plaintiff's evidence was unchallenged and credible. The court therefore ordered that the suit land be transferred directly to the interested party, Phoebe Kivandi Lovon.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim allowed in part; suit land to be transferred to interested party; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The suit land North Maragoli/Mbale/1549 shall be transferred directly to the interested party, Phoebe Kivandi Lovon.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
32 paragraphs
REPUBLICOF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KAKAMEGA
CIVIL CASE NO. 168 OF 2010
BEATRICE KAGAI LOVONI…………………….....…………… PLAINTIFF
AND
PHOEBE KIVANDI LOVON ………………..………. INTERESTED PARTY
VERSUS
HILLARY KAMADI ALUGAYA ……………………............…….DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
1. By a plaint dated 5. 11. 2010, Beatrice Kagai Lovoni pleaded that the Defendant was her nephew and son of the interested party. That she purchased land parcel No. North Maragoli/Mbale/1549 on behalf of the interested party and registered it in her own names.
2. That in 2007, she planned to migrate to the United States of America where the Interested Party resides and she decided to transfer the land to the Defendant to hold in trust for the interested Party, his mother. The plans to migrate did not materialize and she sought transfer of the land to the interested party but the Defendant refused to do so. That the Defendant has continued to act dishonestly and with malice with regard to the matter and the particulars thereof are as follows;
a)Treating the suit property as his when he personally contributed nothing towards its acquisition.
b)Forcible detainer.
c)Offering the suit property for sale.
d)Purporting to have purchased the suit land for the sum of Kshs.60,000/= from the plaintiff when he paid nothing for the same
e)Failing to disclose to the land registrar and the tenants that he was only a trustee and or caretaker and not the absolute owner thereof.
f)Obtaining title to the suit land fraudulently.
g)Using abusive and unbecoming language to the plaintiff and the Interested Party.
h)Impersonating as the owner of the property to the tenants when he is not.
i)Collecting rent from the tenants and fraudulently failing to account to the plaintiff and the Interested Party.
j)Obstructing access to the property by the plaintiff and the Interested Party.
k)Failing to abide by the terms of the trust.
3. The plaintiff then seeks the following orders;
a)The entries No. 6 and 7 at Vihiga District Land Registry on the title know as North Maragoli/Mbale.1549 be cancelled and the title reverts to the plaintiff or ALTERNATIVELY transfer of the title be effected by this Honourable Court directly in the name of the Interested Party.
b)Costs be awarded to the plaintiff against the defendant.
4. Although the Defendant was properly served with summons to enter appearance and file defence, he never did so and when she testified before me on 2. 2.2011, the Defendant repeated the above matters and to my mind, there is little more to say. Her evidence is unchallenged and I also uphold it. She struck me as honest and believable and the Defendant was reaping where he never sowed.
5. In the end, the plaintiff has proved her case to the required standard and prayer (a) of the plaint is granted limited only to the order that the suit land be transferred directly to the names of the Interested Party, Phoebe Kivandi Lovon. As the Defendant chose not to respond to the suit, I shall make no order as to costs.
6. Orders accordingly.
Delivered, dated and signed at Kakamega this 14th day of April, 2011
ISAAC LENAOLA
J U D G E