[2018] KEELC 4752 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 4752 (KLR)

The court found that the application for reinstatement was unopposed as the respondents failed to file any response or submissions despite being given an opportunity. The plaintiffs provided an explanation for their absence, supported by affidavit evidence, indicating that the non-attendance was not deliberate or...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 4752 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Beatrice Mukami Kirimi; Plaintiff: Lewis Mawira Kirimi; Plaintiff: Emmaculate Kaigongi Kirimi; Plaintiff: Silas Mutugi Kirimi; Defendant: Benjamin Kirimi Ngaine; Defendant: Francis Kirimi Ngaruni
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 261 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Reinstatement After Dismissal for Non Attendance
Outcome
Application for reinstatement allowed; suit reinstated.
Legal Topics
Reinstatement of Suit, Dismissal for Non Attendance, Affidavit Evidence, Court Discretion
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Reinstatement of Suit Dismissal for Non Attendance Affidavit Evidence Court Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Beatrice Mukami Kirimi

Plaintiff

Lewis Mawira Kirimi

Plaintiff

Emmaculate Kaigongi Kirimi

Plaintiff

Silas Mutugi Kirimi

Plaintiff

Benjamin Kirimi Ngaine

Defendant

Francis Kirimi Ngaruni

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Reinstatement After Dismissal for Non Attendance

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be reinstated after dismissal for non-attendance by the plaintiffs.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs have provided sufficient explanation for their absence in court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for reinstatement was unopposed as the respondents failed to file any response or submissions despite being given an opportunity. The plaintiffs provided an explanation for their absence, supported by affidavit evidence, indicating that the non-attendance was not deliberate or intentional. In the absence of opposition and given the explanation provided, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application and reinstate the suit as drawn.

Court Disposition

Application for reinstatement allowed; suit reinstated.

Orders

  • The suit is reinstated as drawn.