[2012] KEHC 3305 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 3305 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had established sufficient grounds for the grant of a temporary injunction to restrain the defendant from interfering with their occupation of the premises. The court also found it appropriate, given the conduct of the defendant and the dispute over rent collection, to order that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] KEHC 3305 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Beatrice Wanjiru Njoroge; Applicant: Lucy Muthoni Njoroge; Respondent: City Council of Nairobi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 18 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Rent Deposit
Outcome
interlocutory injunction granted; rent to be deposited in court; costs to applicants
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Rent Deposit Orders, Quiet Enjoyment of Property, Eviction Restraint
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Interlocutory Injunctions Rent Deposit Orders Quiet Enjoyment of Property Eviction Restraint

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Beatrice Wanjiru Njoroge

Applicant

Lucy Muthoni Njoroge

Applicant

City Council of Nairobi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Rent Deposit

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to an interlocutory injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with their occupation of the premises pending determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants should be compelled to deposit rent into court pending the hearing and determination of the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had established sufficient grounds for the grant of a temporary injunction to restrain the defendant from interfering with their occupation of the premises. The court also found it appropriate, given the conduct of the defendant and the dispute over rent collection, to order that all rents be deposited into the High Court with notice to the defendant. The orders were made to preserve the applicants' rights and prevent further interference or eviction pending the hearing and determination of the suit.

Court Disposition

interlocutory injunction granted; rent to be deposited in court; costs to applicants

Orders

  • Applicants to deposit all rents to the High Court with notice to the defendant.
  • Temporary injunction issued restraining the defendant, its servants or agents from interfering with the applicants' quiet occupation of Stall No.157 within Kariokor Market and from evicting the applicants.