[2021] KEHC 2117 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had spent one month and twenty-nine days in remand custody prior to being released on bond. The law mandates that such period must be credited towards the sentence imposed. Since the applicant was unable to pay the fine and was serving the default custodial sentence, the court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 2117 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Bedford Njeru Kamiri; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Naivasha
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E094 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Sentence Revision Application
- Outcome
- Application partially allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Wildlife Offences, Sentencing Revision, Remand Custody Credit
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bedford Njeru Kamiri
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Sentence Revision Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the period spent by the applicant in remand custody prior to sentencing should be taken into account in computing his sentence.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a revision of sentence to substitute imprisonment with probation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had spent one month and twenty-nine days in remand custody prior to being released on bond. The law mandates that such period must be credited towards the sentence imposed. Since the applicant was unable to pay the fine and was serving the default custodial sentence, the court ordered that the period spent in remand custody be deducted from his sentence, regardless of any remission that may be credited. The application for substitution of the sentence with probation was not specifically addressed, as the only issue canvassed was the remand period credit, which was granted.
Court Disposition
Application partially allowed.
Orders
- The period of one month and twenty-nine days spent in remand custody by the applicant shall be deducted from his sentence, any remission credited notwithstanding.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIVASHA
MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. E094 OF 2021
BEDFORD NJERU KAMIRI......APPLICANT
-VERSUS-
REPUBLIC..............................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Applicant herein was the 1st Accused in Engineer PM’s Court Criminal Case No. 1094 of 2018 where they were jointly charged with being in possession of Wildlife Trophy contrary to Section 95 of the Wildlife Conservation and Management Act, 2013. The particulars of the charge were that on the 2nd day of September, 2018 at Njabini town within Nyandarua County were jointly found in possession of nine (9) pieces of elephant tusks weighing 23 Kg with a street value of Kshs 2. 3 million without a permit from the Director of Kenya Wildlife Service.
2. At the conclusion of the trial, all the three accused persons were found guilty as charged. They were each sentenced to pay a fine of Kshs 800,000/= in default serve 2 years imprisonment. The sentence was passed on 1st March, 2021.
3. The Applicant herein did not prefer an appeal against both the conviction and sentence. Instead, he filed this instant application vide a Chamber Summons filed on 13th April, 2021 in which he asks the court to revise the sentence by substituting it with probation.
4. The application was canvassed before me on 4th November, 2021. The Applicant was in person whilst the Respondent was represented by learned State Counsel, Ms. Maingi. The Applicant submitted on only one issue, that the court should take into account the period he spent in remand custody before the sentence was passed to which Ms. Maingi had no objection.
5. I have considered the record. It is notable from the charge sheet that the Applicant was arrested on 2nd September, 2018 and was released on bond on 31st October, 2018. He thus was in remand custody for one (1) month and 29 days. Since it is apparent that he is unable to meet the fine imposed, the law provides that the court should take into account the period he had spent in remand custody before the sentence was passed. In the circumstance, I hereby order that the period of one (1) month and 29 days should be deducted from his sentence, any remission credited notwithstanding. It is so ordered.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIVASHA THIS 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
G. W. NGENYE-MACHARIA
JUDGE
In the presence of:
1. Bedford Njeru Kamiri - Applicant in person
2. Ms. Maingi for the Respondent