[2020] KEHC 2401 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 2401 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent's claim was not quantified in the pleadings, contrary to the applicant's assertion. The Taxing Master had taxed the bill of costs in accordance with the Advocates Remuneration Order and the applicable Rules. The applicant failed to demonstrate any error in principle or law by the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 2401 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Bedrock Holdings Limited; Defendant: Bedrock Security Services Limited; Defendant: Erick Ouma Okeyo; Applicant: Patrick Ochieng Odipo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 134 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Chamber Summons / Reference Against Taxation of Bill of Costs
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Advocates Remuneration Order, Reference Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Advocates Remuneration Order Reference Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bedrock Holdings Limited

Plaintiff

Bedrock Security Services Limited

Defendant

Erick Ouma Okeyo

Defendant

Patrick Ochieng Odipo

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Chamber Summons / Reference Against Taxation of Bill of Costs

  1. 1 Whether the Taxing Master erred in taxing the bill of costs on the basis that the respondent's claim was not quantified.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to have items 1 and 2 of the bill of costs allowed as drawn.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent's claim was not quantified in the pleadings, contrary to the applicant's assertion. The Taxing Master had taxed the bill of costs in accordance with the Advocates Remuneration Order and the applicable Rules. The applicant failed to demonstrate any error in principle or law by the Taxing Master. The respondent, despite alleging excessiveness, did not file a reference. Accordingly, the court held that there was no merit in the applicant's reference and dismissed the Chamber Summons.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The Chamber Summons dated 12.06.2020 is dismissed.