[2007] KEHC 2307 (KLR)
The court found that the sentence of five years imprisonment with hard labour for indecent assault was lawful and not excessive, considering the maximum sentence prescribed by law is 21 years. The trial court exercised its discretion appropriately, and there was no justification to interfere with the sentence. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] KEHC 2307 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Benard Mburu Muthoni; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 148 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Judges
- MM Kasango
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, Indecent Assault, Child Offences
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Benard Mburu Muthoni
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for indecent assault was excessive or improper.
- 2 Whether there was any basis to interfere with the sentence imposed by the trial court.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the sentence of five years imprisonment with hard labour for indecent assault was lawful and not excessive, considering the maximum sentence prescribed by law is 21 years. The trial court exercised its discretion appropriately, and there was no justification to interfere with the sentence. The appeal on sentence was therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal on sentence is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
12 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI Criminal Appeal 148 of 2004
BENARD MBURU MUTHONI………...........…….APPELLANT
Versus
REPUBLIC……………………………..…….….RESPONDENT
(Being appeal against conviction and sentence by L. Nyambura, Senior Resident Magistrate, in the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Criminal Case No. 807 of 2003 at Muranga)
JUDGMENT
The Appellant at the lower court was facing a charge of defilement of a girl contrary to Section 145 (1) of The Penal Code and an alternative charge of indecent assault on a female contrary to Section 144 (1) of The Penal Code and a charge of escape from lawful custody contrary to Section 123 of the Penal Code. He was convicted of the alternative charge of indecent assault. He was sentenced to five (5) years imprisonment with hard labour.
The Appellant was aggrieved with the conviction and sentence and accordingly preferred this appeal. At the hearing of the appeal, the Appellant abandoned his appeal against conviction and instead retained the grounds of appeal on the sentence. Appellant indicated that he was remaining with only 20 days to his sentence before being released. The evidence against the Appellant was that when the complainant was sent to the shop by her grandmother she met the Appellant who took her to his house. At his house he smeared Vaseline to the complainant’s private part. The complainant was six (6) years old. On being convicted of the offence of indecent assault the court sentenced the Appellant to five (5) years and hard labour.
I have considered the mitigation offered by the Appellant and I find that I cannot fault the sentence given to him. The maximum sentence was 21 years with hard labour. Accordingly the appeal on sentence is hereby dismissed.
Dated and delivered at Nyeri this 29th day of June 2007.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE