[2022] KEBPRT 90 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that the tenancy agreement between the parties set the rent at Kshs 12,500 per month and that any increase in rent must be effected in accordance with the law. The purported increase to Kshs 15,000 was not shown to have followed the prescribed legal process and was therefore not valid. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEBPRT 90 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Benard Mutua Kiema; Respondent: Berita Mulwa
- Court
- Business Premises Rent Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case 615 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications Regarding Rent, Eviction, and Arrears
- Outcome
- Interlocutory orders granted; tenant to pay Kshs 12,500 per month; landlord may distress for arrears in default; parties to file statements of account; tenant to remain in premises.
- Legal Topics
- Controlled Tenancy, Rent Disputes, Distress for Rent, Eviction Protection
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Benard Mutua Kiema
Applicant
Berita Mulwa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications Regarding Rent, Eviction, and Arrears
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tenant is entitled to protection against eviction without notice.
- 2 Whether the landlord is entitled to levy distress for alleged rent arrears.
- 3 Whether the rent increase from Kshs 12,500 to Kshs 15,000 was lawful.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the tenancy agreement between the parties set the rent at Kshs 12,500 per month and that any increase in rent must be effected in accordance with the law. The purported increase to Kshs 15,000 was not shown to have followed the prescribed legal process and was therefore not valid. The Tribunal was unable to ascertain the precise amount of rent arrears due to lack of clear statements of account but noted a claim of Kshs 30,000 in arrears. The Tribunal ordered the tenant to continue paying Kshs 12,500 monthly and allowed the landlord to levy distress for rent arrears in case of default. Both parties were directed to file statements of account within 30 days and to...
Court Disposition
Interlocutory orders granted; tenant to pay Kshs 12,500 per month; landlord may distress for arrears in default; parties to file statements of account; tenant to remain in premises.
Orders
- Tenant to continue paying Kshs 12,500 per month.
- In default of payment, landlord is at liberty to levy distress for rent arrears.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 615 OF 2020 (NAIROBI)
BENARD MUTUA KIEMA.....TENANT/APPLICANT
AND
BERITA MULWA............LANDLADY/RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Tenant moved the Tribunal on 11th June 2020 by a notice of motion application under certificate and a reference dated 12th June 2020 seeking protection against eviction without notice. I granted interim orders on 2nd July 2020which orders are in place to date.
2. The Landlord moved this Tribunal on 14th July 2020 via a notice of motion under certificate seeking the said orders to be set aside and/or vailed and leave to levy distress to recover all the rent arrears.
3. On 2nd December 2020, the Tenant yet again filed a notice of motion application seeking orders similar to the 11th June 2020 application and an additional orders to stop rent increase from Kshs 12,500/- to Kshs 15,000/- without leave of the Tribunal and the Landlord to be restrained from locking and/or letting out the premises. The prayers were granted on 14th December 2020 and the rent increase stopped.
4. A replying affidavit was sworn on 6th January 2021 in response to the notice of motion of 2nd December 2020 wherein several averments have been made amongst them being rent default and arrears and several incidents narrated. An agreement has been annexed for rent of Kshs 12,500/- and receipts for Kshs 15,000/-.
5. The Tenant in this the case had filed a further affidavit in support to their application of 2nd December 2020 wherein he avers that he has redone the interiors on the shop at a cost of Kshs 210,000/-. City council has demolished part of the shop and the extra room was in compensation thus rent is Kshs 12,500/-. He stated that all the incidences were non issues and not proven. A loan statement has been annexed by the Tenant and he urges the Tribunal to review the rent to Kshs 7,000/-.
6. Having read the submissions of the Landlord and the Tenant having not appeared on several occasions and having failed to file submissions, I am of the opinion that a lease existed for Kshs 12,500/-.I believe a road destroyed the shop and additional space was given. What is not clear is the charges for the space or whether it was to be a replacement.
7. The agreement is clear. Nothing would be easier than doing an agreement if new terms/space were involved as such.
8. I find rent to be Kshs 12,500/- unless increased in the manner prescribed by law.
9. I have tried to look for arrears amount to no avail. No statement is provided other than a claim for Kshs 30,000/- owing as at the submissions date.
10. I am therefore inclined to order the Tenant to keep paying Kshs 12,500/- per month in default, the Landlord to distress for rent arrears.
11. The Tenant to remain in the premises.
12. The Landlord and Tenant to file statements of accounts within 30 days and fix the reference for hearing within 90 days.
13. Costs in the cause.
HON A. MUMA
VICE CHAIR
BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
RULING DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY BY HON A. MUMA THIS 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2022 IN
THE ABSENCE OF THE PARTIES
HON A. MUMA
VICE CHAIR
BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL