[2019] KEELC 816 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 816 (KLR)

The court found that while the Defence was filed out of time and without leave, the Defendant has acknowledged the error and has filed an application seeking extension of time to regularize the Defence. The court emphasized that it has the discretion to strike out pleadings filed out of time but also the power to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 816 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Benard Ndichu Mwaura; Defendant: Godfrey Gitahi Keen
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 60 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Directions for Hearing
Outcome
Preliminary Objection and application for extension of time to be heard together; no final determination on striking out Defence at this stage.
Judges
OA Angote
Legal Topics
Filing Out of Time, Extension of Time, Striking Out Pleadings, Preliminary Objection
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Filing Out of Time Extension of Time Striking Out Pleadings Preliminary Objection

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benard Ndichu Mwaura

Plaintiff

Godfrey Gitahi Keen

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Directions for Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the Defence filed by the Defendant out of time without leave of court should be struck out.
  2. 2 Whether the court should first hear the Defendant's application for extension of time before determining the Preliminary Objection.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that while the Defence was filed out of time and without leave, the Defendant has acknowledged the error and has filed an application seeking extension of time to regularize the Defence. The court emphasized that it has the discretion to strike out pleadings filed out of time but also the power to extend time in the interest of justice. Given the pending application for extension of time, the court held that it is just and proper to hear the application for extension of time together with the Preliminary Objection. The outcome of the application for extension of time will determine whether the Defence stands or is struck out. The court therefore directed that both the...

Court Disposition

Preliminary Objection and application for extension of time to be heard together; no final determination on striking out Defence at this stage.

Orders

  • The Preliminary Objection dated 23rd August, 2018 shall be heard alongside the Notice of Motion dated 8th May, 2019.