[2007] KEHC 2812 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 2812 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had complied with all procedural requirements for entry of judgment on the tribunal award. The respondent, despite being served, failed to attend or oppose the application. There was no valid objection before the court to prevent the adoption of the award as a judgment....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KEHC 2812 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Virginia Ngari; Respondent: Benard Ngari
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 2 of 1994
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Judgment on Tribunal Award
Outcome
application allowed; judgment entered in terms of tribunal award
Legal Topics
Enforcement of Tribunal Awards, Entry of Judgment, Land Disputes, Procedural Applications
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Enforcement of Tribunal Awards Entry of Judgment Land Disputes Procedural Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Virginia Ngari

Applicant

Benard Ngari

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Judgment on Tribunal Award

  1. 1 Whether the court should enter judgment in terms of the award filed by the Land Disputes Tribunal.
  2. 2 Whether there are any valid objections or reasons to withhold entry of judgment on the award.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had complied with all procedural requirements for entry of judgment on the tribunal award. The respondent, despite being served, failed to attend or oppose the application. There was no valid objection before the court to prevent the adoption of the award as a judgment. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion to enter judgment in terms of the award filed by the Gichugu Land Disputes Tribunal, as there was no legal impediment or substantive reason to withhold such judgment.

Court Disposition

application allowed; judgment entered in terms of tribunal award

Orders

  • Judgment is entered in terms of the Award of Land Dispute Tribunal Gichugu filed in court on 15th April 1998.
  • There shall be no order as to costs in respect of the Notice of Motion dated 3rd November 2006.