[2020] KEHC 209 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 209 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants were not served with the mandatory 10 days' notice of delivery of judgment as required by law, and that the judgment was delivered in their absence. This constituted a plausible reason for the delay in filing the appeal. The court held that the applicants had demonstrated...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 209 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Benard Ochieng Anyumba; Applicant: Esther C. Kenduiyo; Applicant: Johana K. Langat; Respondent: Nelly Cherono Towett
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bomet
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 7 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution
Outcome
application allowed with conditions
Judges
AN Ongeri
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Service of Judgment Notice
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Leave to Appeal Service of Judgment Notice

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benard Ochieng Anyumba

Applicant

Esther C. Kenduiyo

Applicant

Johana K. Langat

Applicant

Nelly Cherono Towett

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the applicants should be granted leave to appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants were properly served with notice of delivery of judgment.
  3. 3 Whether stay of execution should be granted pending appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants were not served with the mandatory 10 days' notice of delivery of judgment as required by law, and that the judgment was delivered in their absence. This constituted a plausible reason for the delay in filing the appeal. The court held that the applicants had demonstrated sufficient cause to warrant the extension of time to appeal. Consequently, the court granted leave to appeal out of time and stay of execution, subject to conditions including the filing of the intended appeal within 30 days and the deposit of half the decretal sum in a joint interest-earning account.

Court Disposition

application allowed with conditions

Orders

  • Leave to appeal out of time is granted; the intended appeal must be filed within 30 days of the ruling date.
  • Stay of execution is granted pending appeal, subject to conditions.