[2022] KEELC 1659 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 1659 (KLR)

The court held that the applicant, as the successful party in the judgment, has a constitutionally protected right to property under Article 40(1) of the Constitution. The inability to access information regarding the encumbrances on the suit properties constitutes a violation of this right. The court further found...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 1659 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Benina Wairimu Kabui; Respondent: John Kinyua Kabui; Respondent: Franvis Muriithi Kabui
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kerugoya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 799 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Execution of Judgment, Land Charges, Access to Information, Right to Property
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Execution of Judgment Land Charges Access to Information Right to Property

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benina Wairimu Kabui

Applicant

John Kinyua Kabui

Respondent

Franvis Muriithi Kabui

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to access loan status statements and discharge of charge documents for the suit properties to facilitate execution of judgment.
  2. 2 Whether the refusal to provide information on encumbrances violates the applicant's constitutional right to property and access to information.
  3. 3 Whether customer confidentiality can override the applicant's right to information necessary for execution of a court decree.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the applicant, as the successful party in the judgment, has a constitutionally protected right to property under Article 40(1) of the Constitution. The inability to access information regarding the encumbrances on the suit properties constitutes a violation of this right. The court further found that the applicant had exhausted administrative mechanisms to obtain the information, and that the information sought is necessary for the exercise and protection of her right to the suit lands. The respondents' argument that disclosure would breach customer confidentiality was found untenable in light of the applicant's constitutional rights. The court concluded that the...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The 1st Defendant is ordered to deliver a certified loan status statement for title number MUTIRA/KAGUYU/608 within 7 days.
  • In default, the Chief Executive Officer Fortune Sacco Society Limited is ordered to issue a loan status statement and discharge of charge for MUTIRA/KAGUYU/608 if no outstanding loan exists.