[2020] KECA 408 (KLR)

[2020] KECA 408 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the prolonged delay of eight months in seeking extension of time to file the notice of appeal, when the required period was only 14 days. Even accounting for their claim of late awareness and an unsuccessful stay application, the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KECA 408 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Benjamin Amchat; Applicant: Jackson Kipsang Kogo; Respondent: Beatrice Nanyama Murunga
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 137 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal Out of Time / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Land Ownership Dispute, Eviction Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time Notice of Appeal Land Ownership Dispute Eviction Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benjamin Amchat

Applicant

Jackson Kipsang Kogo

Applicant

Beatrice Nanyama Murunga

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal Out of Time / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have demonstrated sufficient cause for extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the notice of appeal was inordinate and unexplained.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent would suffer prejudice if the application is granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the prolonged delay of eight months in seeking extension of time to file the notice of appeal, when the required period was only 14 days. Even accounting for their claim of late awareness and an unsuccessful stay application, the delay remained unexplained and inordinate. The court exercised its discretion against the applicants, holding that the conditions for extension of time were not met, and dismissed the application for lack of merit.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for extension of time to file and serve the notice of appeal is dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.