[2019] KEELRC 1460 (KLR)
The Court found that the Petitioner, as a public officer, was entitled to constitutional and statutory protections before termination, specifically those under Article 236 of the Constitution and the County Governments Act. The disciplinary process leading to his termination was not shown to have been conducted by...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELRC 1460 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Dr. Benjamin Kipkoech Koskei; Respondent: His Excellency the Governor, Nakuru County; Respondent: The County Secretary, County Government of Nakuru; Respondent: County Government of Nakuru
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition 11 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application for Conservatory Orders Pending Hearing of Petition
- Outcome
- Application for conservatory orders allowed in part; matter referred to Nakuru Court for further directions.
- Judges
- MSA Makhandia
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Termination, Disciplinary Processes, Public Service Protections, Conservatory Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr. Benjamin Kipkoech Koskei
Applicant
His Excellency the Governor, Nakuru County
Respondent
The County Secretary, County Government of Nakuru
Respondent
County Government of Nakuru
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application for Conservatory Orders Pending Hearing of Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the termination of the Petitioner from public office was unlawful and in contravention of constitutional and statutory protections.
- 2 Whether the disciplinary process leading to the Petitioner’s termination complied with the County Governments Act and the Constitution.
- 3 Whether the Petitioner is entitled to conservatory orders restraining the Respondents from appointing another person to his former position pending determination of the Petition.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the Petitioner, as a public officer, was entitled to constitutional and statutory protections before termination, specifically those under Article 236 of the Constitution and the County Governments Act. The disciplinary process leading to his termination was not shown to have been conducted by the County Public Service Board or by persons with properly delegated authority. The Court noted the egregious nature of the termination and the existence of a subsisting court order interdicting the recruitment process, which the Respondents disregarded. In light of these factors, the Court determined that the Petitioner had established a prima facie case warranting the grant...
Court Disposition
Application for conservatory orders allowed in part; matter referred to Nakuru Court for further directions.
Orders
- Petition to be placed before the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru for further orders and directions.
- Deputy Registrar to transmit the file to Nakuru for hearing and determination of the Petition.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
51 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAKURU
PETITION NO. 11 OF 2019
IN THE MATTER OF: ARTICLES 10, 41, 47, 50, 176, 179, 232 AND 236 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA
AND
IN THE MATTER OF: ALLEGED CONTRVAVENTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS UNDER ARTICLES 28, 41, 47 AND 50 OF THE CONSTITUTION
AND
IN THE MATTER OF: THE COUNTY GOVERNMENTS ACT, 2012 NO. 17 OF 2012
AND
IN THE MATTER OF: SECTIONS 45, 47, 49 AND 50 OF THE EMPLOYMENT ACT, 2007
AND
IN THE MATTER OF: THE UNLAWFUL AND UNFAIR TERMINATION OF THE PETITION
BETWEEN
DR. BENJAMIN KIPKOECH KOSKEI..............................PETITIONER
v
HIS EXCELLENCY
THE GOVERNOR, NAKURU COUNTY....................1st RESPONDENT
THE COUNTY SECRETARY,
COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF NAKURU................2nd RESPONDENT
COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF NAKURU................3rd RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Petitioner moved the Court sitting in Nakuru on 15 May 2019 under certificate of urgency and because the Resident Judge, Employment and Labour Relations Court was not sitting on that day, the Deputy Registrar forwarded the application to Nairobi to be placed before the Duty Judge.
2. The Duty Judge heard the Petitioner ex parte on 17 May 2019, and upon being satisfied that the application was urgent, directed that it be served on the Respondents for inter partes hearing in Nairobi on 27 May 2019.
3. The Respondents filed a replying affidavit in opposition to the application on 24 May 2019, and the Court took arguments as scheduled on 27 May 2019.
4. The Petitioner was appointed as Chief Officer, Department of Youth and Sports with effect from 26 April 2018. The contract was to lapse on 30 November 2022.
5. Barely 4 months later, the employment relationship hit turbulence as the Petitioner was accused of breaching confidentiality, leading to suspension.
6. The Petitioner felt aggrieved with the suspension and he moved the Employment and Labour Relations Court in Nakuru (Nakuru Petition No. 19 of 2018) alleging breach of contract and unfair labour practices.
7. The Court delivered judgment on 29 April 2019 dismissing the suit. Soon thereafter, the Petitioner was subjected to a disciplinary process.
8. The Petitioner again moved the Court (Nakuru Cause No. 64 of 2019) seeking a conservatory order interdicting the recruitment process for the position of Chief Officer, Youth and Sports.
9. Makau J by consent of the parties granted an order interdicting the recruitment process on 5 April 2019. The order was extended on 24 April 2019 pending inter partes hearing.
10. Despite the consent order, the Respondents informed the Petitioner of the termination of his employment on 7 May 2019.
11. It is the termination of employment which was the immediate genesis of the instant Petition/application in which the Petitioner is seeking orders
(a) …
(b) …
(c) THAT pending the hearing and determination of the substantive Petition filed herewith, this Honourable Court be pleased to issue a conservatory order restraining and/or prohibiting the Respondents, their officers, staff, agents, servants and/or any other persons acting at their behest howsoever from appointing any officer to the Petitioner’s employment position.
12. The Petitioner was serving in a public office and was thus afforded protections assured all public officers by Article 236 of the Constitution, before termination of employment.
13. Apart from the constitutional protection, the Petitioner’s employment was governed by the provisions of the County Governments Act.
14. Under section 59(1)(c) as read with section 55(4)(iv) of the Act, disciplinary control over the Petitioner was the mandate of the County Public Service Board.
15. It appears that the 12 persons who handled the Petitioner’s disciplinary case were not members of the County Public Service Board. If they were acting pursuant to delegated authority, the same was not disclosed (should be in writing).
16. Although the Court should approach with caution disputes where a termination of employment has already taken place, more so in ordinary employment where there are no special statutory or constitutional protections, the egregious nature of the termination of the Petitioner’s employment herein does not augur well in terms of principles governing public service (disciplinary committee).
17. The Court is in the circumstances satisfied that an order in terms proposed by the Petitioner in paragraph (c) of the motion dated 15 May 2019 is warranted.
18. But because there are subsisting orders in Nakuru Cause No. 64 of 2019, the Court will not make any substantive order but direct that this Petition be placed before the Court sitting in Nakuru for further orders/directions.
19. The Deputy Registrar to transmit this file to Nakuru for hearing and determination of the Petition. Parties to appear before Deputy Registrar, Nakuru on 3 June 2019 at 9. 00am.
20. Costs in the cause.
Delivered, dated and signed in Nairobi on this 29th day of May 2019.
Radido Stephen
Judge
Appearances
For Petitioner Ms. Matasi instructed by Gordon Ogola, Kipkoech & Co. Advocates
For Respondents Mr. Kibet instructed by Mirugi Kariuki & Co. Advocates
Court Assistant Lindsey