[2018] KEHC 4667 (KLR)
The court found that the application for resentencing was supported by an affidavit that was not commissioned. Under Kenyan law, affidavits must be properly commissioned to be valid. The absence of a commissioned affidavit rendered the application incurably incompetent. Consequently, the court struck out the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 4667 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Benjamin Obati Ayoki; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application 57 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Resentencing
- Outcome
- application struck out as incompetent
- Legal Topics
- Resentencing Application, Affidavit Requirements, Procedural Incompetence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Benjamin Obati Ayoki
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Resentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for resentencing is competent in the absence of a properly commissioned supporting affidavit.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application for resentencing was supported by an affidavit that was not commissioned. Under Kenyan law, affidavits must be properly commissioned to be valid. The absence of a commissioned affidavit rendered the application incurably incompetent. Consequently, the court struck out the application for failing to comply with mandatory procedural requirements.
Court Disposition
application struck out as incompetent
Orders
- The application is rejected and struck out as being incurably incompetent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA
MISC. CR. APPL. NO. 57 OF 2018
(CORAM: R. E. ABURILI - J.)
BENJAMIN OBATI AYOKI...........................APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC...................................................RESPONDENT
RULING ON APPLICATION
I have considered the application filed in court on 25th April 2018 for Orders or resentencing.
I however observe that the so called sworn supporting affidavit is not commissioned.
I reject the application and strike out as being incurably incompetent.
Orders accordingly.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at SIAYA this 31ST day of July 2018.
R.E. ABURILI
JUDGE