[2018] KEHC 110 (KLR)
The court found that the cash bail of Kshs.75,000 was manifestly excessive given the applicant's unemployment and financial hardship. The court exercised its discretion to reduce the cash bail to Kshs.25,000, ensuring that the bail terms were reasonable and not punitive. Additionally, recognizing the applicant's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 110 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Benson Kimani Maina; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Narok
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application 66 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Variation of Bail Terms
- Outcome
- application for variation of bail terms granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Bail Variation, Pretrial Release Conditions, Right to Healthcare in Custody
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Benson Kimani Maina
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Variation of Bail Terms
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a variation of bail terms due to financial constraints and health conditions.
- 2 Whether the applicant should be granted access to specialized medical treatment while in custody.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the cash bail of Kshs.75,000 was manifestly excessive given the applicant's unemployment and financial hardship. The court exercised its discretion to reduce the cash bail to Kshs.25,000, ensuring that the bail terms were reasonable and not punitive. Additionally, recognizing the applicant's medical needs, the court ordered that he be taken to Narok General Hospital or another suitable facility for treatment. The court emphasized the constitutional rights to reasonable bail and access to healthcare for persons in custody. All other aspects of the application were denied.
Court Disposition
application for variation of bail terms granted in part
Orders
- Cash bail reduced to Kshs.25,000.
- The officer in charge of the Government Prison facility is directed to take the applicant to Narok General Hospital or another suitable medical facility for treatment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAROK
MISC. CRIMINAL APP. NO. 66 OF 2018
BENSON KIMANI MAINA............................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC...................................................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The applicant has applied for variation of his bail terms through a notice of motion dated 21/6/2018. His application is based on Articles 21 (1), 23 (1), 43 (1) (a), 43 (2), 49 (h) and 163 (3) of the 2010Constitution of Kenya, sections 123, 124 and 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 75) Laws of Kenya and all enabling provisions of the law. In addition to seeking an order for variation of his bail terms, the applicant also seeks an order to compel the Superintendent in charge of the prison at Narok to take him to the Narok General Hospital for special treatment.
2. The applicant has supported his application with 16 grounds. He has stated the following major grounds. Firstly, he has stated that he was charged with the composite charge of house breaking contrary to section 304 (1) (b) and stealing contrary to section 268 (1) as read with section 279 (b) of the Penal Code (Cap 63) Laws of Kenya. Additionally he has been charged with the alternative charge of handling stolen property contrary to section 322 (1) and (2).
3. He has also stated that he was admitted to cash bail of Kshs.75,000 or to execute a bond of Kshs.100,000 with a surety of a similar amount. He has further stated that his family has great financial constraints with an ailing father who has a young daughter to maintain. In his oral submissions in this court he submitted that he is unemployed and he suffers from dermatitis.
4. In addition to the grounds set out on the face of the notice of motion, the applicant has deponed to a 19 paragraphs supporting affidavit. In that affidavit he has deponed to the following major matters. He has replicated the same matters that are set out as grounds in support of his application in the notice of motion.
5. He has further deponed that he has elderly parents. He has also deponed that he is suffering from rare ailments, which cause weakness in his joints, chest pains, swollen face and wasting away of his skin.
6. The prosecution is not opposed to variation of his bail terms.
7. I have considered the grounds and the affidavit evidence in support of his application. I find that the cash bail of Kshs.75,000 is manifestly excessive in view of the fact that he is not employed. In the circumstances I reduce the cash bail to Kshs.25,000.
8. As regards his ailments I grant his order for treatment in a health facility that is in a position to treat him in addition to Narok General hospital.
9. The upshot of the foregoing is that the application for variation of his bail terms is granted. He may be released on a cash bail of Kshs.25,000/=. The officer in charge of the Government Prison facility is hereby directed to take the applicant to Narok General Hospital or to such other similar medical facility for treatment. Additionally his application fails in all other aspects.
Ruling deliveredinopen court this 5thday of July 2018 in the presence of Mr. Langat holding brief for Mr. Kiongo for the applicant and Ms Nyaroita for the state.
J.M. BWONWONGA
JUDGE
5/7/2018