[2000] KECA 193 (KLR)
The Court found that the applicant's delay of nearly 12 months in filing the application for extension of time to lodge a notice and record of appeal was inordinate and unexplained, as the applicant failed to demonstrate any steps taken to safeguard his right of appeal. Furthermore, the application had not been...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2000] KECA 193 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Benson M’nguthuri; Respondent: Francis Muchiri
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 153 of 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Reference From Single Judge to Full Bench on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- reference dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Service of Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Benson M’nguthuri
Applicant
Francis Muchiri
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Reference From Single Judge to Full Bench on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient reason for the inordinate delay in filing the application for extension of time to lodge a notice and record of appeal.
- 2 Whether failure to serve the application for extension of time on the respondent within a reasonable period is fatal to the application.
- 3 Whether the rules of the Court of Appeal permit withdrawal of a reference or application once filed.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the applicant's delay of nearly 12 months in filing the application for extension of time to lodge a notice and record of appeal was inordinate and unexplained, as the applicant failed to demonstrate any steps taken to safeguard his right of appeal. Furthermore, the application had not been served on the respondent within a reasonable time, contrary to the requirements established in prior case law. The Court also held that there is no provision in the Court of Appeal Rules for withdrawal of references or applications once filed. Consequently, the reference lacked merit and was dismissed.
Court Disposition
reference dismissed
Orders
- The reference is dismissed.
- No order as to costs, as the respondent did not attend the hearing of the reference.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
51 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NYERI
CORAM: OMOLO, SHAH & BOSIRE, JJ.A.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI.153 OF 1999 BETWEEN
BENSON M’NGUTHURI..........................................................................APPLICANT
AND
FRANCIS MUCHIRI.............................................................................RESPONDENT
(An application for extension of time and for leave to lodge notice of appeal
and record of appeal out of time in an intended appeal from the Ruling of the
High Court of Kenya at Meru (Etyang, J) dated 31st July, 1998
in
H.C.C.A. NO. 40 OF 1996)
******************
RULING OF THE COURT
This is a reference from the decision of a single Judge, Ole Keiwua JA, in which he declined to exercise his discretion under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, to extend the time within which to file and serve a notice of appeal and thereafter the record of appeal, against the decision of the superior court (Etyang, J) in its Civil Case No. 40 of 1996. The learned single Judge considered the application fully and assigned reasons, which we agree with for dismissing the application. Mr. Kariuki for the applicant having reconsidered the reference by his client to the full court now applies for leave to withdraw the application. We think that apart from the fact that in our view the reference lacks merits, there is no provision in our rules for withdrawing references or applications made to this Court. In the circumstances, the order which commends itself to us is to dismiss the reference but make no order as to costs as the respondent did not attend the hearing of the reference though served.
Dated and delivered at Nyeri this 26th day of October, 2000
R.S.C. OMOLO
------------------------
JUDGE OF APPEAL
A.B. SHAH
-------------------------
JUDGE OF APPEAL
S.E.O. BOSIRE
----------------------------
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NYERI
CORAM: KEIWUA, J.A.(IN CHAMBERS)
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 153 OF 1999(NYR.13/99)
BETWEEN
BENSON M'NGUTHURI ...................................... APPLICANT
AND
FRANCIS MUCHIRI ........................................ RESPONDENT
(In the matter of an application for extension of time and for leave to lodge
Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal out of time in an intended appeal from the
Ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Meru (Hon. Justice Etyang) dated 31st
July, 1998
in
H.C.C.A NO. 40 OF 1996)
************
R U L I N G
In this application for leave to lodge the Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal out of time, the ruling against which the applicant seeks to challenge was delivered on July 31, 1998 but the application for enlargement of time was not filed in Court until June 14, 1999 which by any standards along period of time which delay the applicant would wish to blame on his previous advocates. In my judgment the inordinate delay is fatal to the application and that is more the position in the absence of any satisfactory explanation of what steps the applicant himself took to see to it that his right of appeal is not jeopardised by the inaction on the part of his then Counsel.
There is yet another huddle to the success of the application namely the fact that the same application has never been served todate on the respondent. Though time within which the application for leave is not specified under our rules, this Court in the case ofL. Z. Engineering & Another vs Trade Bank & Another Civil Application No. 282 of 1999held that an application for enlargement of time must be served on the respondent within a reasonable time which in that case was 25 days which was found to be not reasonable. Similarly, in this application a period of close to 12 months cannot by any stretch of imagination be regarded as reasonable and I accordingly dismiss the application with costs to the respondent.
Dated and delivered this 17th day of May, 2000.
M. KEIWUA
--------------------
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR