[2021] KEHC 5957 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 5957 (KLR)

The court found that the replying affidavit by Hannington Mushera Imbayi, who was not a party to the proceedings before the lower court, could not be admitted in the appeal. The introduction of new matters or evidence at the appellate stage requires leave of the court, which was not sought or granted in this case....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 5957 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Benson Musonye Musoga & Others; Respondent: The Board of Trustees, Friends Church (Quakers) Nairobi Yearly Meeting
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E207 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Objection Ruling
Outcome
Objection allowed; replying affidavit and annextures expunged from the record.
Legal Topics
Affidavit Evidence, Party Status, Introduction of New Evidence
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Affidavit Evidence Party Status Introduction of New Evidence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benson Musonye Musoga & Others

Appellant

The Board of Trustees, Friends Church (Quakers) Nairobi Yearly Meeting

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Objection Ruling

  1. 1 Whether a replying affidavit sworn by a non-party can be admitted in an appeal.
  2. 2 Whether new evidence or matters can be introduced at the appellate stage without leave of court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the replying affidavit by Hannington Mushera Imbayi, who was not a party to the proceedings before the lower court, could not be admitted in the appeal. The introduction of new matters or evidence at the appellate stage requires leave of the court, which was not sought or granted in this case. The court further held that the relevant provisions cited by the applicant and respondent (Sections 78 and 79 of the Civil Procedure Act, and the Court of Appeal Rules) were not applicable to the objection at hand. Consequently, the objection was upheld and the replying affidavit, together with its annextures, was expunged from the record.

Court Disposition

Objection allowed; replying affidavit and annextures expunged from the record.

Orders

  • The replying affidavit by Hannington Mushera Imbayi sworn on 7th June 2021 and annextures HMI 1, 2, 3 & 5 are expunged from the record.
  • Application to proceed to hearing.