[2014] KEHC 7439 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 7439 (KLR)

The majority of the bench (Justices Nduma and Makau) held that neither the High Court nor the Industrial Court was functus officio regarding the issue of jurisdiction, as the conflicting decisions had resulted in no final determination. The constitution of a three-judge bench by the Chief Justice under Article...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 7439 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Benson Ndwiga Njue & 108 Others; Defendant: Central Glass Industries Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 515 of 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Preliminary Objection on Jurisdiction and Composition of Bench
Outcome
Preliminary objections on recusal and bench composition dismissed by majority; dissenting judge recused himself.
Judges
MN Nduma, AN Makau, DW Mbuteti
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Courts, Recusal of Judges, Transitional Provisions, Employment Termination Disputes
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Civil Procedure Jurisdiction of Courts Recusal of Judges Transitional Provisions Employment Termination Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benson Ndwiga Njue & 108 Others

Plaintiff

Central Glass Industries Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Preliminary Objection on Jurisdiction and Composition of Bench

  1. 1 Whether the High Court and Industrial Court are functus officio on the issue of jurisdiction in this matter.
  2. 2 Whether a mixed bench of High Court and Industrial Court judges is constitutionally proper.
  3. 3 Whether Hon. Justice Hatari Waweru should recuse himself for having previously ruled on the same jurisdictional issue.

Ratio Decidendi

The majority of the bench (Justices Nduma and Makau) held that neither the High Court nor the Industrial Court was functus officio regarding the issue of jurisdiction, as the conflicting decisions had resulted in no final determination. The constitution of a three-judge bench by the Chief Justice under Article 165(4) provided a fresh mandate to resolve the substantial constitutional question of jurisdiction. The majority further held that there is no constitutional or statutory bar to a mixed bench of High Court and Industrial Court judges, as all puisne judges are of equal status and take the same oath of office. The legal threshold for recusal was not met for any of the judges, as the...

Court Disposition

Preliminary objections on recusal and bench composition dismissed by majority; dissenting judge recused himself.

Orders

  • The bench as constituted (Nduma, Makau, Waweru JJ) is properly seized of the matter and will proceed to hear it, subject to the recusal of Waweru, J as per his dissenting ruling.
  • The invitation for recusal of the majority judges is declined.