[2000] KECA 245 (KLR)
The court found that although the applicant's advocate failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for his absence, the case was borderline and merited the benefit of the doubt. Exercising judicial discretion, the court allowed reinstatement of the application but imposed a condition that the applicant pay the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2000] KECA 245 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Benson Ngugi Muiruri; Respondent: Kenya National Capital Corporation
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 236 of 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Reinstatement After Dismissal for Non Attendance
- Outcome
- Application allowed; previous dismissal order set aside; application reinstated on terms.
- Legal Topics
- Reinstatement of Application, Non Attendance, Costs Award, Court Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Benson Ngugi Muiruri
Applicant
Kenya National Capital Corporation
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Reinstatement After Dismissal for Non Attendance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application dismissed for non-attendance should be reinstated.
- 2 Whether the applicant's advocate's absence was sufficiently explained to justify reinstatement.
- 3 What terms, if any, should be imposed for reinstatement.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the applicant's advocate failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for his absence, the case was borderline and merited the benefit of the doubt. Exercising judicial discretion, the court allowed reinstatement of the application but imposed a condition that the applicant pay the respondent's costs assessed at KES 10,000 within 10 days. Failure to comply would result in automatic dismissal of the application without further order. The decision balances the need for finality and discipline in litigation with the interests of justice and the applicant's right to be heard.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; previous dismissal order set aside; application reinstated on terms.
Orders
- The order dated 21st April 1999 dismissing the application is set aside.
- The application is reinstated.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
7 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CORAM: KWACH, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 236 OF 1998 BETWEEN
BENSON NGUGI MUIRURI .............................. APPLICANT AND KENYA NATIONAL CAPITAL CORPORATION ................ RESPONDENT(Appeal from a Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Hon. Justice Ole Keiwua) dated 10th February 1998 in H.C.C.C. NO. 1981 OF 1993) *************** R U L I N G
This is an application for reinstatement of the application which I dismissed on 21st April, 1999 for non attendance. For some reason the application was listed before two Judges of Appeal namely Kwach and Owuor JJA. But this cannot justify the decision by Mr Khaminwa to send his clerk to Court knowing fully well that a clerk could not possibly deal with the matter on his behalf. Mr Khaminwa has not explained why he was not in Court when the matter was called. He may have been engaged elsewhere, I do not know.
This is a very borderline case and I am prepared to give Mr Khaminwa the benefit of doubt, but on terms Accordingly, I allow the application, set aside my order dated 21st April 1999 and reinstate the Motion. The applicant will pay the respondent=s costs assessed at Shs 10,000/ - within 10 days , and in default this application to stand dismissed with costs without any further order.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 19th day of January, 2000.
R. O. KWACH --------------------------------- JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR