[2004] KEHC 1999 (KLR)

[2004] KEHC 1999 (KLR)

The court found that the affidavit of service disclosed that the defendants were not personally served as required by law. Service was effected on a clerk and the husband of the second defendant, which does not satisfy the legal requirements for personal service. As a result, the interlocutory judgment was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2004] KEHC 1999 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Benson Nyangaka Makutwa; Defendant: Chairman Nambale Land Disputes Tribunal; Defendant: Agnes Khisa
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Busia
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 24 of 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Judgment
Outcome
Ex parte judgment and subsequent proceedings set aside; plaintiff to effect proper service.
Judges
JK Sergon
Legal Topics
Service of Process, Ex Parte Judgment, Setting Aside Judgment, Land Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Service of Process Ex Parte Judgment Setting Aside Judgment Land Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benson Nyangaka Makutwa

Plaintiff

Chairman Nambale Land Disputes Tribunal

Defendant

Agnes Khisa

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the ex parte judgment was validly obtained in the absence of personal service on the defendants.
  2. 2 Whether the interlocutory judgment and subsequent proceedings should be set aside due to improper service.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the affidavit of service disclosed that the defendants were not personally served as required by law. Service was effected on a clerk and the husband of the second defendant, which does not satisfy the legal requirements for personal service. As a result, the interlocutory judgment was irregularly obtained. The court held that it is entitled to set aside such a judgment ex debito justitiae when there is a clear procedural error. Consequently, the ex parte judgment entered on 11th September 2003 and the subsequent proceedings were set aside, and the plaintiff was directed to properly serve the defendants in accordance with the law.

Court Disposition

Ex parte judgment and subsequent proceedings set aside; plaintiff to effect proper service.

Orders

  • The ex parte judgment entered on 11th September 2003 is set aside.
  • The subsequent ex parte proceedings taken on 31st May 2004 are set aside.