[2021] KECA 630 (KLR)

[2021] KECA 630 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the two-year delay in filing and serving the letter requesting proceedings and the record of appeal. Although the applicants claimed their advocate was at fault, there was no evidence that the advocate admitted to the omission or...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KECA 630 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Benson Nzambu; Applicant: George Ogondo; Applicant: Benson Ochoka; Applicant: Agnetta Mueni Mungei; Respondent: Jedida Onduso Akanda
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application E459 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve Letter Requesting Proceedings and Record of Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
AK Murgor
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Delay and Indolence, Prejudice to Respondent
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time Appeal Procedure Delay and Indolence Prejudice to Respondent

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benson Nzambu

Applicant

George Ogondo

Applicant

Benson Ochoka

Applicant

Agnetta Mueni Mungei

Applicant

Jedida Onduso Akanda

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve Letter Requesting Proceedings and Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have provided sufficient reason for the 2-year delay in filing and serving the letter requesting proceedings and record of appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the omission by the applicants' advocate constitutes a justifiable ground for extension of time.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent would suffer prejudice if the extension of time is granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the two-year delay in filing and serving the letter requesting proceedings and the record of appeal. Although the applicants claimed their advocate was at fault, there was no evidence that the advocate admitted to the omission or that the applicants took any steps to mitigate the delay. The applicants' inaction for two years demonstrated indolence and lack of interest in the appeal. Furthermore, the applicants did not attach the judgment or a draft memorandum of appeal, making it impossible for the court to assess the chances of success of the intended appeal. The respondent had already taken possession...

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 18th November 2020 is dismissed with costs to the respondent.