[2013] KEELRC 562 (KLR)

[2013] KEELRC 562 (KLR)

The court found that the Respondents were properly served with the Summons to Enter Appearance and other court processes. The attendance of the 1st Respondent’s National Chairman in court to fix the hearing date was sufficient to bind the Respondents, and the argument that he lacked authority from the General...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEELRC 562 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Benter Akinyi Opan; Respondent: Kenya Union of Post Primary Education Teachers; Respondent: Akelo Misori, Secretary General; Respondent: Wicks Mwethi Njenga
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 842 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Ruling on Application to Review and Set Aside Award
Outcome
application refused
Legal Topics
Service of Process, Ex Parte Proceedings, Review of Award
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Service of Process Ex Parte Proceedings Review of Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benter Akinyi Opan

Claimant

Kenya Union of Post Primary Education Teachers

Respondent

Akelo Misori, Secretary General

Respondent

Wicks Mwethi Njenga

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Ruling on Application to Review and Set Aside Award

  1. 1 Whether the Respondents were properly served with court process and summons to enter appearance.
  2. 2 Whether the absence of the Respondents at the ex parte proceedings was justified.
  3. 3 Whether there are grounds to review and set aside the award delivered in favour of the Claimant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Respondents were properly served with the Summons to Enter Appearance and other court processes. The attendance of the 1st Respondent’s National Chairman in court to fix the hearing date was sufficient to bind the Respondents, and the argument that he lacked authority from the General Secretary was unconvincing. There was no credible evidence of collusion or procedural impropriety. The absence of affidavits from key officers further weakened the Respondents’ case. The court concluded that there were no valid grounds to excuse the Respondents’ absence at the ex parte proceedings or to review and set aside the award in favour of the Claimant.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

  • The application dated 3rd May 2013 is refused.
  • Interim stay of execution is lifted.