[2020] KEHC 3748 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's motion for leave to appeal out of time and for stay of execution was rendered moot by the prior dismissal of the related miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal against the lower court judgment. The applicant failed to disclose the existence of the pending miscellaneous...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 3748 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Bernard Kabeu Kiriu; Respondent: Francis Waithaka Kiriu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kiambu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 89 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Judges
- CW Meoli
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Stay of Execution, Abuse of Court Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bernard Kabeu Kiriu
Applicant
Francis Waithaka Kiriu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to leave to appeal out of time against the lower court's ruling of 14th May 2019.
- 2 Whether the application for stay of execution or setting aside of the lower court's ruling is merited.
- 3 Whether the application constitutes an abuse of the court process due to non-disclosure of the pending miscellaneous application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's motion for leave to appeal out of time and for stay of execution was rendered moot by the prior dismissal of the related miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal against the lower court judgment. The applicant failed to disclose the existence of the pending miscellaneous application at the time of filing the present application, amounting to an abuse of the court process. As the substratum of the application had disappeared, the court held that the application could not proceed and must be dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application filed on 10th June 2019 is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KIAMBU
CIVIL APPEAL NO 89 OF 2019
BERNARD KABEU KIRIU.................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
FRANCIS WAITHAKA KIRIU......................RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
1. By a ruling delivered on 19th September 2019 this court dismissed the motion filed by the Applicant Bernard Kabeu Kiriu on 27 /7/18 and which had sought leave to appeal against the judgment delivered on 14/12/17 and execution orders made on 12/3/19 in Thika CM’s Succession Cause No. 160 of 2006 In the matter of the Estate of Wairimu Kiriu alias Lydia Wairimu Kiriu. The said motion for leave to appeal out of time had been filed in Kiambu HC. Misc. App No.151 of 2018. It appears that prior to the ruling delivered on 19th September 2019, the Applicant had approached the lower court by an application dated 20/3/19 seeking stay of execution of the judgment delivered by the lower court on 14/12/17, pending the outcome of his miscellaneous application to this court, to appeal out of time. His said application was dismissed by the lower court on 14th May 2019.
2. Further, despite the pendency of the ruling in the miscellaneous cause before this court, the Applicant proceeded to file a memorandum of appeal in respect of the ruling of 14th May 2019 in the lower court. The appeal, HCCA No. 89 of 2019 (the instant cause) was filed on 10th June 2019 contemporaneously with an application seeking among other orders, leave to appeal against the said ruling and stay of execution or setting aside of the said ruling pending determination of the intended appeal.
3. The application was supported by the affidavit of the Applicant which made no direct reference to the pending miscellaneous application. The application was opposed by Francis Waithaka Kiriu, who termed the application as an abuse of the Court process pointing out that the pending miscellaneous cause was not an appeal in respect of the judgment of the lower court or subsequent orders.
4. The application was canvassed by way of written submissions. The court has considered the affidavits and submissions filed in respect of the motion which is the subject of this ruling. The orders for leave to appeal out of time and stay sought by the Applicant relate to the ruling of the lower court delivered on 14th May 2019. The said ruling was in respect of an application seeking stay of execution of the judgment delivered on 14th December 2017 and subsequent orders of 12/3/19, pending the hearing and determination of Misc. Application No. 151 of 2018now already determined.
5. Upon the dismissal of the miscellaneous application by this court on 19th September 2019 the substratum of the Applicant’s present application has disappeared. The Applicant failed to disclose, at the time of making the present application, that a related miscellaneous
6. cause seeking leave to appeal against the lower court judgment was pending before this court. In my view, given these facts, no more needs to be said. The application filed on 10th June 2019 cannot proceed in vacuo, must fail and is hereby dismissed with costs.
SIGNED AND DELIVERED ELECTRONICALLY ON THIS 16TH DAY OF JULY 2020.
C. MEOLI
JUDGE