[2013] KEHC 1922 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 1922 (KLR)

The court found that the grant dated 2nd December 1998 had already been revoked by a previous order and a fresh grant had been issued to the parties. As such, the grant sought to be revoked did not exist at the time of the present application. The application was therefore futile and amounted to an abuse of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 1922 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Bernard Kariuki Mwangi; Applicant: Amos Chege Kariuki; Respondent: Erustus Thuo Kariuki
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 2807 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Revocation of Grant, Letters of Administration, Abuse of Court Process
Source Language
en
Family and Children Revocation of Grant Letters of Administration Abuse of Court Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bernard Kariuki Mwangi

Applicant

Amos Chege Kariuki

Applicant

Erustus Thuo Kariuki

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant dated 2nd December 1998 exists and is available for revocation.
  2. 2 Whether the application dated 5th October 2012 seeking revocation of the grant is merited.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the grant dated 2nd December 1998 had already been revoked by a previous order and a fresh grant had been issued to the parties. As such, the grant sought to be revoked did not exist at the time of the present application. The application was therefore futile and amounted to an abuse of the court process. The court dismissed the application with costs to prevent unnecessary litigation and uphold the integrity of its processes.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application dated 5th October 2012 is dismissed with costs.