[2020] KEHC 2093 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 2093 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's sentence was imposed after the Supreme Court's Muruatetu decision and that the court was aware of and applied the relevant guidelines, including consideration of mitigating circumstances. The court determined that there was no compelling reason to allow the application for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 2093 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Bernard Kipkorir Cheruiyot; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 9 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Resentencing Application
Outcome
Application for resentencing partially allowed; applicant sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment from the date of the ruling.
Judges
HK Chemitei
Legal Topics
Resentencing, Robbery With Violence, Mitigating Circumstances, Supreme Court Guidelines
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Resentencing Robbery With Violence Mitigating Circumstances Supreme Court Guidelines

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bernard Kipkorir Cheruiyot

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Resentencing Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to resentencing in light of the Supreme Court decision in Muruatetu.
  2. 2 Whether the original sentence was imposed in accordance with the law and after considering mitigating circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's sentence was imposed after the Supreme Court's Muruatetu decision and that the court was aware of and applied the relevant guidelines, including consideration of mitigating circumstances. The court determined that there was no compelling reason to allow the application for resentencing, as the applicant had already benefited from the post-Muruatetu legal framework. However, the court exercised its discretion to impose a determinate sentence, considering the gravity of the offence, and sentenced the applicant to 15 years' imprisonment from the date of the ruling.

Court Disposition

Application for resentencing partially allowed; applicant sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment from the date of the ruling.

Orders

  • The applicant is sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment from 28th October 2020.
  • The application for resentencing is otherwise dismissed.