[2016] KEHC 853 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 853 (KLR)

The court found that the defendant had failed and refused to comply with the judgment delivered by consent on 30th September 2014, specifically by not executing the necessary documents for subdivision and transfer of parcel Kiirua/Nkando/537 to the plaintiffs. The court held that to prevent frustration of its...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 853 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Bertha Mwari Kimathi; Applicant: Elizabeth Nchoro M'Rukaria; Applicant: Julia Maregi Muketha; Applicant: Alice Nthiori M'Marete; Applicant: Joseph Kithure; Applicant: Margaret Karwitha Muthaura; Applicant: Martin Kinyua; Applicant: Hellen Mugure; Respondent: Silas Maingi M'Muthaura
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 131 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Post Judgment Application for Execution
Outcome
application allowed in part
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Execution of Judgment, Land Subdivision, Transfer of Title, Court Orders, Land Registration
Source Language
en
Land and Property Execution of Judgment Land Subdivision Transfer of Title Court Orders Land Registration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bertha Mwari Kimathi

Applicant

Elizabeth Nchoro M'Rukaria

Applicant

Julia Maregi Muketha

Applicant

Alice Nthiori M'Marete

Applicant

Joseph Kithure

Applicant

Margaret Karwitha Muthaura

Applicant

Martin Kinyua

Applicant

Hellen Mugure

Applicant

Silas Maingi M'Muthaura

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Post Judgment Application for Execution

  1. 1 Whether the court should dispense with the original title deed held by the defendant to facilitate subdivision and transfer of land as per the judgment.
  2. 2 Whether the Executive Officer should be empowered to execute necessary instruments for subdivision and transfer in place of the defendant.
  3. 3 Whether the Land Registrar should be directed to implement the court's judgment despite the defendant's non-cooperation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant had failed and refused to comply with the judgment delivered by consent on 30th September 2014, specifically by not executing the necessary documents for subdivision and transfer of parcel Kiirua/Nkando/537 to the plaintiffs. The court held that to prevent frustration of its judgment and to protect the interests of the plaintiffs, it was necessary to dispense with the original title deed held by the defendant and empower the Executive Officer of the Meru Law Courts to execute all necessary instruments for subdivision and transfer. The Land Registrar was also to be directed to implement the judgment. The court granted the application as prayed in prayer...

Court Disposition

application allowed in part

Orders

  • The original title deed held by the defendant is dispensed with.
  • The Executive Officer, Meru Law Courts, is empowered to execute all necessary instruments to facilitate subdivision and transfer of parcels from Kiirua/Nkando/537 to the plaintiffs as per the judgment dated 30th September 2014.