[2011] KEHC 4346 (KLR)
The court held that personal service of the contempt application and hearing notice on the Town Clerk was not effected, as the documents were served on a third party (Miss Mukami) rather than the contemnor himself. There was no evidence that the Town Clerk was aware that the application sought his committal to jail...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 4346 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Beth Wambui; Respondent: Town Clerk of the City Council of Nairobi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application 567 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Contempt Application
- Outcome
- Application for committal for contempt adjourned; applicant directed to effect personal service afresh.
- Judges
- CC Kipkorir
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Contempt of Court, Personal Service, Enforcement of Court Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Beth Wambui
Applicant
Town Clerk of the City Council of Nairobi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Contempt Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Town Clerk was personally served with the hearing notice for the contempt application.
- 2 Whether service on a third party (Miss Mukami) constitutes personal service on the contemnor.
- 3 Whether the application for committal for contempt can proceed in the absence of proper personal service.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that personal service of the contempt application and hearing notice on the Town Clerk was not effected, as the documents were served on a third party (Miss Mukami) rather than the contemnor himself. There was no evidence that the Town Clerk was aware that the application sought his committal to jail for contempt of court. Given the serious nature of contempt proceedings, which may result in deprivation of liberty, strict compliance with personal service requirements is necessary. The court found that it would not be just to dismiss the application outright due to improper service. Instead, in the interests of justice, the court directed that the applicant serve the Notice...
Court Disposition
Application for committal for contempt adjourned; applicant directed to effect personal service afresh.
Orders
- Applicant to serve the Notice of Motion afresh on the Town Clerk personally.
- Hearing to be scheduled after proper service is effected.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
Miscellaneous CAivil Application 567 of 2008
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW FOR AN ORDER OF MANDAMUS DIRECTED TO THE TOWN CLERK OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF NAIROBI
BETH WAMBUI ……………………………..…..........………………..APPLICANT
VERSUS
THE TOWN CLERK OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF NAIROBI..........RESPONDENT
RULING
Through a Notice of Motion dated 20th June, 2011 the applicant prays that the Town Clerk of the City Council of Nairobi be arrested and detained in prison for a term not exceeding six months. He also prays that the OCS, Central Police Station, Nairobi be ordered to assist and supervise the execution of the arrest and detention of the Town clerk. The application is supported by six grounds on its face:
(a)The Respondent has adamantly refused to obey the Court Order made on 15th November 2009.
(b)The power and authority of the Court is being undermined by the Respondent’s outright defiance of the Court Order.
(c)It is in the interest of justice and fairness that the respondent be punished for his contempt of Court.
(d)On 14th June 2011 the court granted the applicant leave to cite the respondent for contempt of court for failing to comply with the Order that was issued on 15th October 2009.
(e)It is therefore imperative that warrants be issued to arrest and detain the respondent in prison for a term not exceeding six months unless the respondent pays the applicant Kshs.218,092/= with interest at the rate of 12% per annum and costs todate as set out in the annexed schedule.
(f)The court should also order the Officer Commanding Central Police Station (OCS), Nairobi or officers under him, to assist and supervise the arrest and detention of the respondent because the respondent has security which would therefore make it impossible for the court bailiffs alone to execute the arrest.
The procedure of instituting and prosecuting a contempt of court application was clearly set out by Ouko, J in Republic -vs- County Council of Nakuru ex-parte Edward Alera t/a Genesis Reliable Equipment & 2 others [2011] eKLR. An important requirement is that the substantive application plus a copy of the statement and affidavit in support of the application for granting leave must be served personally on the contemnor unless the court has dispensed with such service.
I am of the view that the need to serve the contemnor in person with the application for leave also extends to service of a hearing notice. After all this is an application that seeks to take away the liberty of the contemnor.
The question that needs to be answered is whether the Town Clerk was personally served with the hearing notice. Peter Andemi swore an affidavit of service on 1st November 2011 and stated that when he met the Town Clerk, the Town Clerk directed him to take the papers to the Director of Legal Affairs. He then proceeded and served the papers upon one Miss Mukami. Does this amount to personal service? Was the Town Clerk informed that the papers were to be served on him in person? One cannot say personal service was effected because the Town Clerk was not served. The papers were served on Miss Mukami. There is no evidence that the Town Clerk was aware that the application was for his committal to jail for contempt of court. It would not be just to dismiss the applicant’s application because the service was not proper. In the interests of justice I direct that the Applicant be served with the Notice of Motion afresh for hearing at a date to be taken after the delivery of this ruling.
Dated, signed and delivered at Nairobi this 29th day of November 2011.
W. K. KORIR
JUDGE