[2013] KEHC 4118 (KLR)
The court determined that, given the existence of ongoing and contested succession proceedings regarding the estate of Samson Mburu Huho in the Family Division, it would be inappropriate for criminal investigations or prosecution relating to the will to proceed concurrently. Such actions could prejudice the fair and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 4118 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Betty Rashid; Respondent: Commissioner of Police; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecution; Interested Party: Beth Nyambura Mburu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition 257 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Ruling/directions
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part; 2nd respondent restrained from investigating petitioner regarding the will pending further directions from the Family Division.
- Judges
- DAS Majanja
- Legal Topics
- Right to Fair Trial, Succession Disputes, Probate and Administration, Criminal Investigations, Judicial Review
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Betty Rashid
Applicant
Commissioner of Police
Respondent
Director of Public Prosecution
Respondent
Beth Nyambura Mburu
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling/directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner should be protected from criminal investigation relating to the deceased's will pending determination of succession matters.
- 2 Whether the criminal process should be stayed to avoid interfering with ongoing succession proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that, given the existence of ongoing and contested succession proceedings regarding the estate of Samson Mburu Huho in the Family Division, it would be inappropriate for criminal investigations or prosecution relating to the will to proceed concurrently. Such actions could prejudice the fair and conclusive determination of the validity of the will and the administration of the estate. The court exercised its discretion to restrain the 2nd respondent from investigating the petitioner in relation to the will, pending directions from the Family Division, to ensure that the issues surrounding the estate are resolved in the appropriate forum without interference from...
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part; 2nd respondent restrained from investigating petitioner regarding the will pending further directions from the Family Division.
Orders
- The 2nd respondent is restrained from investigating the conduct of the petitioner in so far as it concerns the last will and testament of Samson Mburu Huho (deceased) pending such directions as shall be issued in HC Succession Case No. 2586 of 2011 and HC Succession Case No. 2649 of 2011 or further orders of the court.
- This order shall be brought to the attention of the judge handling both succession cases.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
High Court at Nairobi (Nairobi Law Courts)
Petition 257 of 2012 [if !mso]> <style> v:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} </style> <![endif]
BETWEEN
BETTY RASHID...................................................................APPLICANT
AND
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE...............................1ST RESPONDENT
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION............2ND RESPONDENT
AND
BETH NYAMBURA MBURU..............................INTERESTED PARTY
RULING/DIRECTIONS
1. The petitioner is an advocate of the High Court and in the course of her duties she alleges that she received the last will and testament of Samson Mburu Huho (deceased) for safe – keeping on or about 1st August 2011. She had been acting for the deceased in several other matters which are not of concern herein.
2. Upon his death, the petitioner states that she read the will to the family. Thereafter, disputes arose among family members as he was a polygamous man. The original will was filed in court for grant of probate through the firm of Kiagayu and Company Advocates in Nairobi Succession Case No. 2586 of 2011. No action has been taken in the matter to date.
3. Members of the family opposed to the will filed an application for grant of letters of administration intestate in Succession Case No. 2649 of 2011. This matter has seen a lot of litigation and will be mentioned in court on 29th April 2013.
4. In the meantime, George Ngugi Wanjiru, a son of the deceased was charged with the offence of forgery contrary to section 350(1)of the Penal Code for forgery of the deceased’s will in Kibera Chief Magistrates Court Criminal Case No. 26660 of 2012. The case is now part-heard and is scheduled for further hearing in June 2012.
5. The petitioner is apprehensive that she will be charged together with the said George Ngugi Wanjiru and she seeks this court’s protection. Mr Njogu, counsel for the 2nd respondent, contends that investigations are still ongoing and that no decision to charge her has been confirmed.
6. Although the Director of Public Prosecutions has a mandate to investigate and prosecute offences, I think this court cannot lose sight of the fact that the Estate of the deceased is a contested matter as there are two causes on the issue in the Family Division. In Succession Cause No. 2586 of 2011, the Court is entitled to come to the conclusion that the deceased’s will is not valid.
7. I take the position, that this matter should not be fought in forums other that the Family Division of the High Court.
8. In view of the foregoing and in order to assist the court conclusively and expeditiously resolve the matters surrounding the Estate of Samson Mburu Huho (deceased), I give the following Direction;
(i)The 2nd respondent is restrained from howsoever from investigating the conduct of the petitioner in so far as it concerns the last will and testament of Samson Mburu Hugo (deceased) pending such directions as shall be issued in HC Succession Case No. 2586 of 2011andHC Succession Case No. 2649 of 2011or further orders of the court.
(ii)This order shall be brought to the attention of the judge handling both succession cases.
(iii)HC Succession Cause No. 2586 of 2011shall be mentioned on 29th April 2013 together with Succession Cause No. 2649 of 2011 for further directions and orders from that court.
(iv)TheParties are at liberty to apply for further or other orders.
DATEDand DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 10th day of April 2013
D.S. MAJANJA
JUDGE
Mr Wamwayi instructed by Wamwayi and Company Advocates for the petitioner.
Mr Njogu, Prosecution Counsel, instructed by the Directorate of Public Prosecutions for the 2nd respondent.
Mr Kamau instructed by P.K. Kamau and Company Advocates for the interested party.