[2000] KECA 167 (KLR)

[2000] KECA 167 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had provided reasonable grounds for his failure to file and serve the notice of appeal within the prescribed time, specifically that he was not notified of the date of delivery of the ruling and was absent when it was delivered. The respondent did not contest these facts....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2000] KECA 167 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Joseph Owotsi Walwanga; Respondent: Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd.; Respondent: Thomas Changilwa Muluhya
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Miscellaneous Application 371 of 1999
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Memorandum of Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed. Time extended for filing and serving notice of appeal and memorandum and record of appeal.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Notice of Appeal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Process Notice of Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Owotsi Walwanga

Applicant

Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd.

Respondent

Thomas Changilwa Muluhya

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Memorandum of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown reasonable grounds for failing to file and serve a notice of appeal within the prescribed time.
  2. 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to extend time for filing and serving the notice and memorandum of appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had provided reasonable grounds for his failure to file and serve the notice of appeal within the prescribed time, specifically that he was not notified of the date of delivery of the ruling and was absent when it was delivered. The respondent did not contest these facts. Exercising its discretion under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, the court granted the extension sought, allowing the applicant 10 days from the date of the ruling to file and serve the notice of appeal, and a further 30 days from the date of filing the notice to file the memorandum and record of appeal. Costs were ordered to be in the intended appeal.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Time extended for filing and serving notice of appeal and memorandum and record of appeal.

Orders

  • Time to file and serve notice of appeal extended by 10 days from the date of this ruling.
  • Time to file memorandum and record of appeal extended by 30 days from the date of filing the notice of appeal.